From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] drm/i915: reorganize the error message for invalid watermarks
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 16:55:52 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181018135552.GC9144@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181016220133.26991-9-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 03:01:30PM -0700, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> Print a more generic "failed to compute watermark levels" whenever any
> of skl_compute_wm_levels() fail, and print only the specific error
> message for the specific cases. This allows us to stop passing pstate
> everywhere, making the watermarks computation code a little less
> dependent on random intel state structs.
Nothing random about those structs. They are *the* state.
Using them directly rather than duplicating informationa in the
wm_params struct would probably make the code look a bit less alien.
But given that the information is duplicated I guess we don't have to
pass in the plane state. So the patch seems fine in that sense.
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 27 ++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 4053f4a68657..1290efc64869 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -4635,13 +4635,11 @@ skl_compute_plane_wm_params(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>
> static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
> - const struct intel_plane_state *intel_pstate,
> int level,
> const struct skl_wm_params *wp,
> const struct skl_wm_level *result_prev,
> struct skl_wm_level *result /* out */)
> {
> - const struct drm_plane_state *pstate = &intel_pstate->base;
> uint32_t latency = dev_priv->wm.skl_latency[level];
> uint_fixed_16_16_t method1, method2;
> uint_fixed_16_16_t selected_result;
> @@ -4763,11 +4761,7 @@ static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> if (level) {
> return 0;
> } else {
> - struct drm_plane *plane = pstate->plane;
> -
> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Requested display configuration exceeds system watermark limitations\n");
> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[PLANE:%d:%s] blocks required = %u/%u, lines required = %u/31\n",
> - plane->base.id, plane->name,
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Requested display configuration exceeds system watermark limitations: blocks required = %u/%u, lines required = %u/31\n",
> res_blocks, wp->ddb_blocks, res_lines);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> @@ -4795,7 +4789,6 @@ static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> static int
> skl_compute_wm_levels(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
> - const struct intel_plane_state *intel_pstate,
> const struct skl_wm_params *wm_params,
> struct skl_plane_wm *wm,
> int plane_id)
> @@ -4816,7 +4809,6 @@ skl_compute_wm_levels(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>
> ret = skl_compute_plane_wm(dev_priv,
> cstate,
> - intel_pstate,
> level,
> wm_params,
> result_prev,
> @@ -4951,10 +4943,13 @@ static int skl_build_pipe_wm(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
> if (!wm_params.plane_visible)
> continue;
>
> - ret = skl_compute_wm_levels(dev_priv, cstate,
> - intel_pstate, &wm_params, wm, 0);
> - if (ret)
> + ret = skl_compute_wm_levels(dev_priv, cstate, &wm_params, wm,
> + 0);
> + if (ret) {
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[PLANE:%d:%s] failed to compute watermark levels\n",
> + plane->base.id, plane->name);
> return ret;
> + }
>
> skl_compute_transition_wm(cstate, &wm_params, &wm->wm[0],
> &wm->trans_wm);
> @@ -4968,10 +4963,12 @@ static int skl_build_pipe_wm(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
> return ret;
>
> ret = skl_compute_wm_levels(dev_priv, cstate,
> - intel_pstate, &wm_params,
> - wm, 1);
> - if (ret)
> + &wm_params, wm, 1);
> + if (ret) {
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[PLANE:%d:%s] failed to compute planar watermark levels\n",
> + plane->base.id, plane->name);
> return ret;
> + }
> }
> }
>
> --
> 2.14.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-18 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-16 22:01 [PATCH 00/11] More watermarks improvements Paulo Zanoni
2018-10-16 22:01 ` [PATCH 01/11] drm/i915: don't apply Display WAs 1125 and 1126 to GLK/CNL+ Paulo Zanoni
2018-10-18 13:14 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-10-22 23:32 ` Paulo Zanoni
2018-10-22 23:55 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-10-23 0:12 ` Paulo Zanoni
2018-10-23 0:18 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-10-23 7:30 ` Jani Nikula
2018-10-26 0:43 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-09 0:50 ` [PATCH] " Paulo Zanoni
2018-10-16 22:01 ` [PATCH 02/11] drm/i915: remove padding from struct skl_wm_level Paulo Zanoni
2018-10-16 23:00 ` Lucas De Marchi
2018-10-16 22:01 ` [PATCH 03/11] drm/i915: fix handling of invisible planes in watermarks code Paulo Zanoni
2018-10-18 13:28 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-10-16 22:01 ` [PATCH 04/11] drm/i915: remove useless memset() for watermarks parameters Paulo Zanoni
2018-10-18 13:31 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-10-16 22:01 ` [PATCH 05/11] drm/i915: simplify wm->is_planar assignment Paulo Zanoni
2018-10-18 13:34 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-10-16 22:01 ` [PATCH 06/11] drm/i915: refactor skl_write_plane_wm() Paulo Zanoni
2018-10-18 13:36 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-10-16 22:01 ` [PATCH 07/11] drm/i915: move ddb_blocks to be a watermark parameter Paulo Zanoni
2018-10-18 13:41 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-10-22 22:29 ` Paulo Zanoni
2018-10-23 12:07 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-10-16 22:01 ` [PATCH 08/11] drm/i915: reorganize the error message for invalid watermarks Paulo Zanoni
2018-10-18 13:55 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2018-10-18 16:18 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-10-22 22:22 ` Paulo Zanoni
2018-10-23 12:02 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-10-16 22:01 ` [PATCH 09/11] drm/i915: make skl_needs_memory_bw_wa() take dev_priv instead of state Paulo Zanoni
2018-10-18 14:02 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-10-16 22:01 ` [PATCH 10/11] drm/i915: add pipe_htotal to struct skl_wm_params Paulo Zanoni
2018-10-18 14:14 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-10-16 22:01 ` [PATCH 11/11] drm/i915: pass dev_priv instead of cstate to skl_compute_transition_wm() Paulo Zanoni
2018-10-18 14:20 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-10-16 22:21 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for More watermarks improvements Patchwork
2018-10-16 22:31 ` Paulo Zanoni
2018-10-16 22:25 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2018-10-16 22:39 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2018-10-16 22:52 ` Paulo Zanoni
2018-10-18 14:34 ` Saarinen, Jani
2018-10-23 0:09 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-10-23 1:41 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2018-11-09 1:28 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for More watermarks improvements (rev2) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181018135552.GC9144@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).