From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] drm/i915: add pipe_htotal to struct skl_wm_params
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 17:14:05 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181018141405.GE9144@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181016220133.26991-11-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 03:01:32PM -0700, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> With this one here we can finally drop the intel state structures from
> the functions that compute watermark values: they all rely on struct
> skl_wm_params now. This should help the watermarks code be a little
> more clear on its intent and also match the spec a little bit more
> with the carefully chosen names for its parameters.
I guess we'll just roll with the duplication.
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 20 ++++++++------------
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index b32d680d9bf0..4712eaea9744 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -1254,6 +1254,7 @@ struct skl_wm_params {
> bool x_tiled, y_tiled;
> bool rc_surface;
> bool is_planar;
> + uint32_t pipe_htotal;
> uint32_t width;
> uint16_t ddb_blocks;
> uint8_t cpp;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index d101c542f10d..b01f3d807ff6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -4549,6 +4549,8 @@ skl_compute_plane_wm_params(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> fb->modifier == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED_CCS;
> wp->is_planar = fb->format->format == DRM_FORMAT_NV12;
>
> + wp->pipe_htotal = cstate->base.adjusted_mode.crtc_htotal;
> +
> if (plane->id == PLANE_CURSOR) {
> wp->width = intel_pstate->base.crtc_w;
> } else {
> @@ -4630,7 +4632,6 @@ skl_compute_plane_wm_params(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> }
>
> static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> - struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
> int level,
> const struct skl_wm_params *wp,
> const struct skl_wm_level *result_prev,
> @@ -4659,17 +4660,15 @@ static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>
> method1 = skl_wm_method1(dev_priv, wp->plane_pixel_rate,
> wp->cpp, latency, wp->dbuf_block_size);
> - method2 = skl_wm_method2(wp->plane_pixel_rate,
> - cstate->base.adjusted_mode.crtc_htotal,
> + method2 = skl_wm_method2(wp->plane_pixel_rate, wp->pipe_htotal,
> latency,
> wp->plane_blocks_per_line);
>
> if (wp->y_tiled) {
> selected_result = max_fixed16(method2, wp->y_tile_minimum);
> } else {
> - if ((wp->cpp * cstate->base.adjusted_mode.crtc_htotal /
> - wp->dbuf_block_size < 1) &&
> - (wp->plane_bytes_per_line / wp->dbuf_block_size < 1)) {
> + if ((wp->cpp * wp->pipe_htotal / wp->dbuf_block_size < 1) &&
> + (wp->plane_bytes_per_line / wp->dbuf_block_size < 1)) {
> selected_result = method2;
> } else if (wp->ddb_blocks >=
> fixed16_to_u32_round_up(wp->plane_blocks_per_line)) {
> @@ -4782,7 +4781,6 @@ static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>
> static int
> skl_compute_wm_levels(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> - struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
> const struct skl_wm_params *wm_params,
> struct skl_plane_wm *wm,
> int plane_id)
> @@ -4802,7 +4800,6 @@ skl_compute_wm_levels(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> result_prev = plane_id ? &wm->uv_wm[0] : &wm->wm[0];
>
> ret = skl_compute_plane_wm(dev_priv,
> - cstate,
> level,
> wm_params,
> result_prev,
> @@ -4937,8 +4934,7 @@ static int skl_build_pipe_wm(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
> if (!wm_params.plane_visible)
> continue;
>
> - ret = skl_compute_wm_levels(dev_priv, cstate, &wm_params, wm,
> - 0);
> + ret = skl_compute_wm_levels(dev_priv, &wm_params, wm, 0);
> if (ret) {
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[PLANE:%d:%s] failed to compute watermark levels\n",
> plane->base.id, plane->name);
> @@ -4956,8 +4952,8 @@ static int skl_build_pipe_wm(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - ret = skl_compute_wm_levels(dev_priv, cstate,
> - &wm_params, wm, 1);
> + ret = skl_compute_wm_levels(dev_priv, &wm_params, wm,
> + 1);
> if (ret) {
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[PLANE:%d:%s] failed to compute planar watermark levels\n",
> plane->base.id, plane->name);
> --
> 2.14.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-18 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-16 22:01 [PATCH 00/11] More watermarks improvements Paulo Zanoni
2018-10-16 22:01 ` [PATCH 01/11] drm/i915: don't apply Display WAs 1125 and 1126 to GLK/CNL+ Paulo Zanoni
2018-10-18 13:14 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-10-22 23:32 ` Paulo Zanoni
2018-10-22 23:55 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-10-23 0:12 ` Paulo Zanoni
2018-10-23 0:18 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-10-23 7:30 ` Jani Nikula
2018-10-26 0:43 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-09 0:50 ` [PATCH] " Paulo Zanoni
2018-10-16 22:01 ` [PATCH 02/11] drm/i915: remove padding from struct skl_wm_level Paulo Zanoni
2018-10-16 23:00 ` Lucas De Marchi
2018-10-16 22:01 ` [PATCH 03/11] drm/i915: fix handling of invisible planes in watermarks code Paulo Zanoni
2018-10-18 13:28 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-10-16 22:01 ` [PATCH 04/11] drm/i915: remove useless memset() for watermarks parameters Paulo Zanoni
2018-10-18 13:31 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-10-16 22:01 ` [PATCH 05/11] drm/i915: simplify wm->is_planar assignment Paulo Zanoni
2018-10-18 13:34 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-10-16 22:01 ` [PATCH 06/11] drm/i915: refactor skl_write_plane_wm() Paulo Zanoni
2018-10-18 13:36 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-10-16 22:01 ` [PATCH 07/11] drm/i915: move ddb_blocks to be a watermark parameter Paulo Zanoni
2018-10-18 13:41 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-10-22 22:29 ` Paulo Zanoni
2018-10-23 12:07 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-10-16 22:01 ` [PATCH 08/11] drm/i915: reorganize the error message for invalid watermarks Paulo Zanoni
2018-10-18 13:55 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-10-18 16:18 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-10-22 22:22 ` Paulo Zanoni
2018-10-23 12:02 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-10-16 22:01 ` [PATCH 09/11] drm/i915: make skl_needs_memory_bw_wa() take dev_priv instead of state Paulo Zanoni
2018-10-18 14:02 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-10-16 22:01 ` [PATCH 10/11] drm/i915: add pipe_htotal to struct skl_wm_params Paulo Zanoni
2018-10-18 14:14 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2018-10-16 22:01 ` [PATCH 11/11] drm/i915: pass dev_priv instead of cstate to skl_compute_transition_wm() Paulo Zanoni
2018-10-18 14:20 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-10-16 22:21 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for More watermarks improvements Patchwork
2018-10-16 22:31 ` Paulo Zanoni
2018-10-16 22:25 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2018-10-16 22:39 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2018-10-16 22:52 ` Paulo Zanoni
2018-10-18 14:34 ` Saarinen, Jani
2018-10-23 0:09 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-10-23 1:41 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2018-11-09 1:28 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for More watermarks improvements (rev2) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181018141405.GE9144@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).