From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/dp: Set the MOT bit for Write_Status_Update_Request transactions
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 23:29:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181210212906.GN9144@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181210210749.20649-1-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 01:07:49PM -0800, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> The Write_Status_Update_Request I2C transaction requires the MOT bit to
> be set, Change the logical AND to OR to fix what looks like a typo.
It's not a type. We're just preserving MOT. What makes you think it
should always be set?
>
> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Fixes: 68ec2a2a2481 ("drm/dp: Use I2C_WRITE_STATUS_UPDATE to drain partial I2C_WRITE requests")
> Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> index 2d6c491a0542..d98805b517f0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> @@ -677,7 +677,7 @@ static void drm_dp_i2c_msg_write_status_update(struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
> * rest of the message
> */
> if ((msg->request & ~DP_AUX_I2C_MOT) == DP_AUX_I2C_WRITE) {
> - msg->request &= DP_AUX_I2C_MOT;
> + msg->request |= DP_AUX_I2C_MOT;
> msg->request |= DP_AUX_I2C_WRITE_STATUS_UPDATE;
> }
> }
> --
> 2.17.1
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-10 21:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-10 21:07 [PATCH] drm/dp: Set the MOT bit for Write_Status_Update_Request transactions Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-12-10 21:29 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2018-12-10 21:44 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2018-12-10 22:15 ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-12-11 13:22 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-12-10 21:42 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2018-12-10 22:49 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181210212906.GN9144@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).