intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] drm/i915/opregion: rvda is relative from opregion base in opregion 2.1+
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 21:10:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190208191048.GY20097@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877eea5clw.fsf@intel.com>

On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 09:00:59PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Feb 2019, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 08:42:53PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >> Starting from opregion version 2.1 (roughly corresponding to ICL+) the
> >> RVDA field is relative from the beginning of opregion, not absolute
> >> address.
> >> 
> >> Fix the error path while at it.
> >> 
> >> v2: Make relative vs. absolute conditional on the opregion version,
> >>     bumped for the purpose. Turned out there are machines relying on
> >>     absolute RVDA in the wild.
> >> 
> >> v3: Fix the version checks
> >> 
> >> Fixes: 04ebaadb9f2d ("drm/i915/opregion: handle VBT sizes bigger than 6 KB")
> >> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> >> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++---
> >>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c
> >> index f1b841580521..5e00ee9270b5 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c
> >> @@ -123,7 +123,8 @@ struct opregion_asle {
> >>  	u64 fdss;
> >>  	u32 fdsp;
> >>  	u32 stat;
> >> -	u64 rvda;	/* Physical address of raw vbt data */
> >> +	u64 rvda;	/* Physical (2.0) or relative from opregion (2.1+)
> >> +			 * address of raw VBT data. */
> >>  	u32 rvds;	/* Size of raw vbt data */
> >>  	u8 rsvd[58];
> >>  } __packed;
> >> @@ -964,9 +965,24 @@ int intel_opregion_setup(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >>  
> >>  	if (opregion->header->over.major >= 2 && opregion->asle &&
> 
> Push this line to short term memory.

Stack overflow.

Series is
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

> 
> >>  	    opregion->asle->rvda && opregion->asle->rvds) {
> >> -		opregion->rvda = memremap(opregion->asle->rvda,
> >> -					  opregion->asle->rvds,
> >> +		resource_size_t rvda = opregion->asle->rvda;
> >> +
> >> +		/*
> >> +		 * opregion 2.0: rvda is the physical VBT address.
> >> +		 *
> >> +		 * opregion 2.1+: rvda is unsigned, relative offset from
> >> +		 * opregion base, and should never point within opregion.
> >> +		 */
> >> +		if (opregion->header->over.major > 2 ||
> >> +		    opregion->header->over.minor >= 1) {
> >
> > What happens with version 1.1?
> 
> Pop. ;)
> 
> BR,
> Jani.
> 
> >
> >> +			WARN_ON(rvda < OPREGION_SIZE);
> >> +
> >> +			rvda += asls;
> >> +		}
> >> +
> >> +		opregion->rvda = memremap(rvda, opregion->asle->rvds,
> >>  					  MEMREMAP_WB);
> >> +
> >>  		vbt = opregion->rvda;
> >>  		vbt_size = opregion->asle->rvds;
> >>  		if (intel_bios_is_valid_vbt(vbt, vbt_size)) {
> >> @@ -976,6 +992,8 @@ int intel_opregion_setup(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >>  			goto out;
> >>  		} else {
> >>  			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Invalid VBT in ACPI OpRegion (RVDA)\n");
> >> +			memunmap(opregion->rvda);
> >> +			opregion->rvda = NULL;
> >>  		}
> >>  	}
> >>  
> >> -- 
> >> 2.20.1
> 
> -- 
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-08 19:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-08 18:42 [PATCH v3 1/3] drm/i915/opregion: fix version check Jani Nikula
2019-02-08 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] drm/i915/opregion: rvda is relative from opregion base in opregion 2.1+ Jani Nikula
2019-02-08 18:57   ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-02-08 19:00     ` Jani Nikula
2019-02-08 19:10       ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2019-02-11 15:36         ` Jani Nikula
2019-02-08 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] HACK: drm/i915/opregion: ICL should have opregion 2.1+ and relative rvda Jani Nikula
2019-02-08 18:51 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [v3,1/3] drm/i915/opregion: fix version check Patchwork
2019-02-08 19:08 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-02-08 23:30 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190208191048.GY20097@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).