From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
Cc: jani.nikula@intel.com, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915/color: move check of gamma_enable to specific func/platform
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2019 23:14:32 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191004201432.GL1208@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191004082610.24664-3-swati2.sharma@intel.com>
On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 01:56:08PM +0530, Swati Sharma wrote:
> Moved common code to check gamma_enable to specific funcs per platform
> in bit_precision func. icl doesn't support that and chv has separate
> enable knob for CGM LUT.
>
> Signed-off-by: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
> index 8f02313a7fef..44ce75f051ad 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
> @@ -1420,6 +1420,9 @@ static int icl_color_check(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>
> static int i9xx_gamma_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> + if (!crtc_state->gamma_enable)
> + return 0;
> +
> switch (crtc_state->gamma_mode) {
> case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT:
> return 8;
> @@ -1433,6 +1436,9 @@ static int i9xx_gamma_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>
> static int ilk_gamma_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> + if (!crtc_state->gamma_enable)
> + return 0;
> +
> if ((crtc_state->csc_mode & CSC_POSITION_BEFORE_GAMMA) == 0)
> return 0;
>
> @@ -1449,14 +1455,24 @@ static int ilk_gamma_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>
> static int chv_gamma_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> - if (crtc_state->cgm_mode & CGM_PIPE_MODE_GAMMA)
> - return 10;
> + if (crtc_state->cgm_mode) {
> + if ((crtc_state->cgm_mode & CGM_PIPE_MODE_GAMMA) == 0)
> + return 0;
> + else
> + return 10;
> + }
> +
> + if (!crtc_state->gamma_enable)
> + return 0;
> else
> return i9xx_gamma_precision(crtc_state);
Again could simplify to just:
if (crtc_state->cgm_mode & CGM_PIPE_MODE_GAMMA)
return 10;
else
return i9xx_gamma_precision(crtc_state);
> }
>
> static int glk_gamma_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> + if (!crtc_state->gamma_enable)
> + return 0;
> +
> switch (crtc_state->gamma_mode) {
> case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT:
> return 8;
> @@ -1473,9 +1489,6 @@ int intel_color_get_gamma_bit_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_stat
> struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->base.crtc);
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
>
> - if (!crtc_state->gamma_enable)
> - return 0;
> -
> if (HAS_GMCH(dev_priv)) {
> if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv))
> return chv_gamma_precision(crtc_state);
> --
> 2.23.0
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-04 20:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-04 8:26 [PATCH 0/4] fix broken state checker and enable state checker for icl+ Swati Sharma
2019-10-04 8:26 ` [PATCH 1/4] [v2] drm/i915/color: fix broken gamma state-checker during boot Swati Sharma
2019-10-04 20:12 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-10-04 8:26 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915/color: move check of gamma_enable to specific func/platform Swati Sharma
2019-10-04 20:14 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2019-10-04 8:26 ` [PATCH 3/4] [v5] drm/i915/color: Extract icl_read_luts() Swati Sharma
2019-10-04 8:26 ` [PATCH 4/4] FOR_TESTING_ONLY: Print rgb values of hw and sw blobs Swati Sharma
2019-10-04 9:29 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for fix broken state checker and enable state checker for icl+ Patchwork
2019-10-04 11:12 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-10-04 14:01 ` [PATCH 0/4] " Saarinen, Jani
2019-10-04 15:20 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191004201432.GL1208@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=swati2.sharma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).