From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF54CC2D0E4 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 07:06:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B036246B0 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 07:06:06 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0B036246B0 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA9C6E4F3; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 07:06:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga12.intel.com (mga12.intel.com [192.55.52.136]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6196A6E4F3 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 07:06:05 +0000 (UTC) IronPort-SDR: NpWKnSw4vunvN4pne5Pq+lLKND4nYUiFdqGLHr2tQBEU9nUOYwcwThD9sek6byv4Zsa03umZVT ZDaC7wzuzvmQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9809"; a="150512933" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,489,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="150512933" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga008.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.58]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Nov 2020 23:06:05 -0800 IronPort-SDR: dMwpwwAbDsFmjME4k+rOxpbx2OFoZr2n4f3zjdBOL57nmGyJY8HnKibfxYczauYR496aIy8fF/ 57P0qH6OULNw== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,489,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="310959751" Received: from xsang-optiplex-9020.sh.intel.com (HELO xsang-OptiPlex-9020) ([10.239.159.140]) by fmsmga008-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Nov 2020 23:05:59 -0800 Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 15:20:18 +0800 From: Oliver Sang To: Joonas Lahtinen Message-ID: <20201119072018.GA15197@xsang-OptiPlex-9020> References: <20201111155811.GB24657@xsang-OptiPlex-9020> <160527763346.5566.3471508802857132043@jlahtine-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <160527763346.5566.3471508802857132043@jlahtine-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [drm/i915/gem] 59dd13ad31: phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second -54.0% regression X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: feng.tang@intel.com, tiejun.li@intel.com, Chris Wilson , frank.du@intel.com, guobing.chen@intel.com, jiebin.sun@intel.com, Shuhua.Fan@intel.com, Matthew Auld , fan.zhao@intel.com, ying.huang@intel.com, shan.kang@intel.com, zhengjun.xing@intel.com, zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com, Wenhuan.Huang@intel.com, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, guangli.li@intel.com, gengxin.xie@intel.com, ming.a.chen@intel.com, yu.ma@intel.com, jessica.ji@intel.com, lkp@lists.01.org, wangyang.guo@intel.com, dapeng1.mi@intel.com, LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 04:27:13PM +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > Hi, > = > Could you add intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org into reports going > forward. > = > Quoting kernel test robot (2020-11-11 17:58:11) > > = > > Greeting, > > = > > FYI, we noticed a -54.0% regression of phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark= .RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second due to commit: > = > How many runs are there on the bad version to ensure the bisect is > repeatable? test 4 times. zxing@inn:/result/phoronix-test-suite/performance-true-Radial_Gradient_Pain= t-1024x1024-jxrendermark-1.2.4-ucode=3D0xd6-monitor=3Dda39a3ee/lkp-cfl-d1/d= ebian-x86_64-phoronix/x86_64-rhel-8.3/gcc-9/59dd13ad310793757e34afa489dd6fc= 8544fc3da$ grep -r "operations_per_second" */stats.json 0/stats.json: "phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x10= 24.operations_per_second": 4133.487932, 1/stats.json: "phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x10= 24.operations_per_second": 4120.421503, 2/stats.json: "phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x10= 24.operations_per_second": 4188.414835, 3/stats.json: "phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x10= 24.operations_per_second": 4068.549514, > = > According to Chris test has various factors affecting why the result > could fluctuate and has been known. Reverting the patch did not have > an effect on the benchmark and was not expected to do so, either. > = > Is there some mechanism to queue a re-run? > = > Would it make sense to do further runs before sending out the e-mail > to avoid false positives. > = > It could of course be also solved by sticking to tests that have less > fluctuation in them. > = > Regards, Joonas > = > > = > > = > > commit: 59dd13ad310793757e34afa489dd6fc8544fc3da ("drm/i915/gem: Flush = coherency domains on first set-domain-ioctl") > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master > > = > > = > > in testcase: phoronix-test-suite > > on test machine: 12 threads Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8700 CPU @ 3.20GHz wit= h 8G memory > > with following parameters: > > = > > need_x: true > > test: jxrendermark-1.2.4 > > option_a: Radial Gradient Paint > > option_b: 1024x1024 > > cpufreq_governor: performance > > ucode: 0xd6 > > = > > test-description: The Phoronix Test Suite is the most comprehensive tes= ting and benchmarking platform available that provides an extensible framew= ork for which new tests can be easily added. > > test-url: http://www.phoronix-test-suite.com/ > > = > > = > > = > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag > > Reported-by: kernel test robot > > = > > = > > Details are as below: > > -----------------------------------------------------------------------= ---------------------------> > > = > > = > > To reproduce: > > = > > git clone https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests.git > > cd lkp-tests > > bin/lkp install job.yaml # job file is attached in this email > > bin/lkp run job.yaml > > = > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > compiler/cpufreq_governor/kconfig/need_x/option_a/option_b/rootfs/tbox_= group/test/testcase/ucode: > > gcc-9/performance/x86_64-rhel-8.3/true/Radial Gradient Paint/1024x102= 4/debian-x86_64-phoronix/lkp-cfl-d1/jxrendermark-1.2.4/phoronix-test-suite/= 0xd6 > > = > > commit: = > > 0dccdba51e ("Merge tag 'gvt-fixes-2020-10-30' of https://github.com/i= ntel/gvt-linux into drm-intel-fixes") > > 59dd13ad31 ("drm/i915/gem: Flush coherency domains on first set-domai= n-ioctl") > > = > > 0dccdba51e852271 59dd13ad310793757e34afa489d = > > ---------------- --------------------------- = > > %stddev %change %stddev > > \ | \ = > > 8980 =B1 2% -54.0% 4127 phoronix-test-suite.jxr= endermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second > > 9.00 +13.9% 10.25 =B1 4% phoronix-test-suite.tim= e.percent_of_cpu_this_job_got > > = > > = > > = = > > = = > > = = > > 10000 +--------------------------------------------------------------= -----+ = > > | = | = > > 9000 |-+.+. .+.+.+.+.+. .+. .+. .+. .+.+. .+. .+. .+. .+.+= . .| = > > |.+ + +.+ + +.+ + +.+.+ + +.+ + = +.+ | = > > | = | = > > 8000 |-+ = | = > > | = | = > > 7000 |-+ = | = > > | = | = > > 6000 |-+ = | = > > | = | = > > | = | = > > 5000 |-+ = | = > > | O = | = > > 4000 +--------------------------------------------------------------= -----+ = > > = = > > = = > > [*] bisect-good sample > > [O] bisect-bad sample > > = > > = > > = > > Disclaimer: > > Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are pr= ovided > > for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or s= oftware > > design or configuration may affect actual performance. > > = > > = > > Thanks, > > Oliver Sang > > = _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx