intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Revert "drm/i915: re-order if/else ladder for hpd_irq_setup"
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 16:19:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201130141954.GS6112@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201128045229.kvxiqjin7k67zkod@ldmartin-desk1>

On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 08:52:29PM -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 02:57:48PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >We now use ilk_hpd_irq_setup for all GMCH platforms that do not have
> >hotplug. These are early gen3 and gen2 devices that now explode on boot
> >as they try to access non-existent registers.
> 
> humn... true, my bad. But I don't think a revert is the right fix. It
> would be much better if we would not be setting up the hpd setup
> function at all for platforms that do not have hotplug. I think a
> separate early check for I915_HAS_HOTPLUG() would be deserved.

I think it generally leads to much less convoluted logic when we keep
gmch vs. rest separate. So I'm confused as to what we're even trying
to achieve here?

> 
> Lucas De Marchi
> 
> >
> >Fixes: 794d61a19090 ("drm/i915: re-order if/else ladder for hpd_irq_setup")
> >Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> >Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> >Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> >Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
> 
> 
> >---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 27 +++++++++++++++------------
> > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> >index dc6febc63f1c..c80eeac53952 100644
> >--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> >+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> >@@ -4242,18 +4242,21 @@ void intel_irq_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > 	 */
> > 	dev_priv->hotplug.hpd_short_storm_enabled = !HAS_DP_MST(dev_priv);
> >
> >-	if (HAS_PCH_DG1(dev_priv))
> >-		dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup = dg1_hpd_irq_setup;
> >-	else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11)
> >-		dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup = gen11_hpd_irq_setup;
> >-	else if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv))
> >-		dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup = bxt_hpd_irq_setup;
> >-	else if (INTEL_PCH_TYPE(dev_priv) >= PCH_SPT)
> >-		dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup = spt_hpd_irq_setup;
> >-	else if (HAS_GMCH(dev_priv) && I915_HAS_HOTPLUG(dev_priv))
> >-		dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup = i915_hpd_irq_setup;
> >-	else
> >-		dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup = ilk_hpd_irq_setup;
> >+	if (HAS_GMCH(dev_priv)) {
> >+		if (I915_HAS_HOTPLUG(dev_priv))
> >+			dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup = i915_hpd_irq_setup;
> >+	} else {
> >+		if (HAS_PCH_DG1(dev_priv))
> >+			dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup = dg1_hpd_irq_setup;
> >+		else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11)
> >+			dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup = gen11_hpd_irq_setup;
> >+		else if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv))
> >+			dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup = bxt_hpd_irq_setup;
> >+		else if (INTEL_PCH_TYPE(dev_priv) >= PCH_SPT)
> >+			dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup = spt_hpd_irq_setup;
> >+		else
> >+			dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup = ilk_hpd_irq_setup;
> >+	}
> > }
> >
> > /**
> >-- 
> >2.20.1
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-30 14:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-27 14:57 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Revert "drm/i915: re-order if/else ladder for hpd_irq_setup" Chris Wilson
2020-11-27 15:25 ` Jani Nikula
2020-11-27 18:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2020-11-27 19:50 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2020-11-28  4:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Lucas De Marchi
2020-11-30 14:19   ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2020-11-30 17:31     ` Lucas De Marchi
2020-11-30 17:46       ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-12-01  5:46         ` Lucas De Marchi
2020-12-01 17:25           ` Ville Syrjälä

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201130141954.GS6112@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).