From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC2DAC07E95 for ; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 20:23:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64EDE619C6 for ; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 20:23:08 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 64EDE619C6 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D6E6E1CF; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 20:23:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga12.intel.com (mga12.intel.com [192.55.52.136]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6B9C6E1CE; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 20:23:06 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10037"; a="189061293" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,221,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="189061293" Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Jul 2021 13:23:06 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,221,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="491839163" Received: from dut029-tgly.fm.intel.com ([10.105.19.10]) by orsmga001-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Jul 2021 13:23:05 -0700 Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2021 20:23:04 +0000 From: Matthew Brost To: John Harrison Message-ID: <20210707202304.GA23844@DUT029-TGLY.fm.intel.com> References: <20210706222010.101522-1-matthew.brost@intel.com> <20210706222010.101522-7-matthew.brost@intel.com> <9834f3c0-a1a3-9b1a-d291-732501b7a013@intel.com> <20210707175015.GA17157@DUT029-TGLY.fm.intel.com> <9f72e74d-f2ae-65ba-cb0d-fc1a7b4df08c@intel.com> <20210707185653.GA23375@DUT029-TGLY.fm.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915/guc: Optimize CTB writes and reads X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 01:21:35PM -0700, John Harrison wrote: > On 7/7/2021 11:56, Matthew Brost wrote: > > > Ok, I sent it but I looks like patchworks didn't like it. Anyways we > > should be able to review that patch. > > > > Matt > Maybe because it came out as 6/56 instead of 6/7? Also, not sure if it needs > to be in reply to 0/7 or 6/7? Yea, that is probably it. I think 6/7 would've made patckworks happy. Matt > > John. > _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx