Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/26] drm/i915/guc: Handle errors in multi-lrc requests

John Harrison
2021-10-12T21:56:51Z

On 10/4/2021 15:06, Matthew Brost wrote:
> If an error occurs in the front end when multi-lrc requests are getting
> generated we need to skip these in the backend but we still need to
> emit the breadcrumbs seqno. An issues arises because with multi-lrc
> breadcrumbs there is a handshake between the parent and children to make
> forward progress. If all the requests are not present this handshake
> doesn't work. To work around this, if multi-lrc request has an error we
> skip the handshake but still emit the breadcrumbs seqno.
>
> v2:
> (John Harrison)
> - Add comment explaining the skipping of the handshake logic
> - Fix typos in the commit message
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> ---
> .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> index 83b0d2a114af..05e8b199e4ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> @@ -4072,8 +4072,8 @@ static int emit_bb_start_child_no_preempt_mid_batch(struct i915_request *rq,
> }
>
> static u32 *
> -emit_fini_breadcrumb_parent_no_preempt_mid_batch(struct i915_request *rq,
> - u32 *cs)
> +__emit_fini_breadcrumb_parent_no_preempt_mid_batch(struct i915_request *rq,
> + u32 *cs)
> {
> struct intel_context *ce = rq->context;
> u8 i;
> @@ -4101,6 +4101,46 @@ emit_fini_breadcrumb_parent_no_preempt_mid_batch(struct i915_request *rq,
> get_children_go_addr(ce),
> 0);
>
> + return cs;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * If this true, a submission of multi-lrc requests had an error and the
> + * requests need to be skipped. The front end (execuf IOCTL) should've called
> + * i915_request_skip which squashes the BB but we still need to emit the fini
> + * breadrcrumbs seqno write. At this point we don't know how many of the
> + * requests in the multi-lrc submission were generated so we can't do the
> + * handshake between the parent and children (e.g. if 4 requests should be
> + * generated but 2nd hit an error only 1 would be seen by the GuC backend).
> + * Simply skip the handshake, but still emit the breadcrumbd seqno, if an error
> + * has occurred on any of the requests in submission / relationship.
> + */
> +static inline bool skip_handshake(struct i915_request *rq)
> +{
> + return test_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_SKIP_PARALLEL, &rq->fence.flags);
> +}
> +
> +static u32 *
> +emit_fini_breadcrumb_parent_no_preempt_mid_batch(struct i915_request *rq,
> + u32 *cs)
> +{
> + struct intel_context *ce = rq->context;
> +
> + GEM_BUG_ON(!intel_context_is_parent(ce));
> +
> + if (unlikely(skip_handshake(rq))) {
> + /*
> + * NOP everything in
> + * __emit_fini_breadcrumb_parent_no_preempt_mid_batch, the -6
The line wrapping makes this look confusing. It seems like the function
name should fit on the line before. Even if it is a few characters over
(although the limit is now 100 not 80, I think), the checkpatch warning
is worth the readability of the code.

> + * comes of the length emission below.
-> comes from the length of the emits below.

John.

> + */
> + memset(cs, 0, sizeof(u32) *
> + (ce->engine->emit_fini_breadcrumb_dw - 6));
> + cs += ce->engine->emit_fini_breadcrumb_dw - 6;
> + } else {
> + cs = __emit_fini_breadcrumb_parent_no_preempt_mid_batch(rq, cs);
> + }
> +
> /* Emit fini breadcrumb */
> cs = gen8_emit_ggtt_write(cs,
> rq->fence.seqno,
> @@ -4117,7 +4157,8 @@ emit_fini_breadcrumb_parent_no_preempt_mid_batch(struct i915_request *rq,
> }
>
> static u32 *
> -emit_fini_breadcrumb_child_no_preempt_mid_batch(struct i915_request *rq, u32 *cs)
> +__emit_fini_breadcrumb_child_no_preempt_mid_batch(struct i915_request *rq,
> + u32 *cs)
> {
> struct intel_context *ce = rq->context;
> struct intel_context *parent = intel_context_to_parent(ce);
> @@ -4144,6 +4185,30 @@ emit_fini_breadcrumb_child_no_preempt_mid_batch(struct i915_request *rq, u32 *cs
> *cs++ = get_children_go_addr(parent);
> *cs++ = 0;
>
> + return cs;
> +}
> +
> +static u32 *
> +emit_fini_breadcrumb_child_no_preempt_mid_batch(struct i915_request *rq,
> + u32 *cs)
> +{
> + struct intel_context *ce = rq->context;
> +
> + GEM_BUG_ON(!intel_context_is_child(ce));
> +
> + if (unlikely(skip_handshake(rq))) {
> + /*
> + * NOP everything in
> + * __emit_fini_breadcrumb_child_no_preempt_mid_batch, the -6
> + * comes from the length the emission below.
> + */
> + memset(cs, 0, sizeof(u32) *
> + (ce->engine->emit_fini_breadcrumb_dw - 6));
> + cs += ce->engine->emit_fini_breadcrumb_dw - 6;
> + } else {
> + cs = __emit_fini_breadcrumb_child_no_preempt_mid_batch(rq, cs);
> + }
> +
> /* Emit fini breadcrumb */
> cs = gen8_emit_ggtt_write(cs,
> rq->fence.seqno,