Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for replace drm_detect_hdmi_monitor() with drm_display_info.is_hdmi (rev3)

Ville Syrjälä
2021-10-19T18:29:38Z

On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 11:04:40AM +0200, Claudio Suarez wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 05:11:46PM -0000, Patchwork wrote:
> > == Series Details ==
> >
> > Series: replace drm_detect_hdmi_monitor() with drm_display_info.is_hdmi (rev3)
> > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/95880/
> > State : failure
> >
> > == Summary ==
> >
> > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10744_full -> Patchwork_21360_full
> > ====================================================
> >
> > Summary
> > -------
> >
> > **FAILURE**
> >
> > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_21360_full absolutely need to be
> > verified manually.
> >
> > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> > introduced in Patchwork_21360_full, please notify your bug team to allow them
> > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> >
> >
> >
> > Possible new issues
> > -------------------
> >
> > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_21360_full:
> >
> > ### IGT changes ###
> >
> > #### Possible regressions ####
> >
> > * igt@kms_bw@linear-tiling-6-displays-3840x2160p:
> > - shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][1]
> > [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21360/shard-tglb2/igt@kms_bw@linear-tiling-6-displays-3840x2160p.html
>
> This is a false positive, isn't it ?

Yes, looks like unrelated nonsense.

>
> - The test is skiped, not failed:
>
> Test requirement not met in function run_test_linear_tiling, file ../tests/kms_bw.c:155:
> Test requirement: !(pipe > num_pipes)
> ASIC does not have 5 pipes
> Subtest linear-tiling-6-displays-3840x2160p: SKIP (0.000s)
> Starting subtest: linear-tiling-6-displays-3840x2160p
> Subtest linear-tiling-6-displays-3840x2160p: SKIP (0.000s)
>
>
> - linear-tiling-6-* is not even listed in https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21359/index.html
>
> Do I have to do anything ? I have verified manually.
>
> Where can I find the "bug team" ? Is this list ?

I've occasionally wondered about that myself...

--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel