public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Lisovskiy, Stanislav" <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Recalculate CDCLK if plane scaling ratio changes
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 09:29:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220113072905.GA5991@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yd7qmU/GCFLdGbjy@intel.com>

On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 04:50:01PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 04:39:17PM +0200, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 03:50:05PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 06:08:12PM +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> > > > Currently we only recalculate CDCLK if active plane mask changes
> > > > or if we do a full modeset, however according to BSpec
> > > > required Dbuf bandwidth calculations also depend on pipe/plane
> > > > scaling ratio, which means that CDCLK must be recalculated
> > > > everytime plane scaling ratio changes,
> > > 
> > > Already handled by the plane min_cdclk stuff.
> > 
> > Problem is that plane min_cdclk will only be called for those
> > which are added to the state.
> > In intel_atomic_check_planes we call intel_crtc_add_planes_to_state
> > only if active_planes_affects_min_cdclk is true and active_planes
> > mask got changed.
> > However if we got one of planes scaling ratio changed, we need to
> > recalculate CDCLK once again and make sure we have all the active
> > planes in state for that. Don't we need all active planes 
> > in state to calculate it properly?
> 
> If the plane's scaling ratio is changing then that plane is already
> in the state. The min_cdclk/data_rate/etc. are all then cached in
> the crtc state so that plane isn't needed again until its scaling
> ratio (or whatever else) changes again.

Yep, was just wondering that according to this logic why we do
call intel_crtc_add_planes_to_state, once active plane mask changes then.

Stan

> 
> -- 
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-13  7:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-11 16:08 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Recalculate CDCLK if plane scaling ratio changes Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-01-11 16:45 ` Jani Nikula
2022-01-12  9:55   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-01-11 18:39 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2022-01-11 18:55 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-01-12  0:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2022-01-12 13:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Ville Syrjälä
2022-01-12 14:39   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-01-12 14:50     ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-01-13  7:29       ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-01-12 13:06 Stanislav Lisovskiy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220113072905.GA5991@intel.com \
    --to=stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox