From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: John.C.Harrison@Intel.com
Cc: IGT-Dev@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org, Intel-GFX@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH v3 i-g-t 07/15] lib/store: Refactor common store code into helper function
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 12:10:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220113201002.GA13315@jons-linux-dev-box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220113195947.1536897-8-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 11:59:39AM -0800, John.C.Harrison@Intel.com wrote:
> From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
>
> A lot of tests use almost identical code for creating a batch buffer
> which does a single write to memory and another is about to be added.
> Instead, move the most generic version into a common helper function.
> Unfortunately, the other instances are all subtly different enough to
> make it not so trivial to try to use the helper. It could be done but
> it is unclear if it is worth the effort at this point. This patch
> proves the concept, if people like it enough then it can be extended.
>
> v2: Fix up object address vs store offset confusion (with help from
> Zbigniew K).
>
> Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
> ---
> lib/igt_store.c | 96 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> lib/igt_store.h | 12 +++++
> lib/meson.build | 1 +
> tests/i915/gem_exec_fence.c | 77 ++---------------------------
> tests/i915/i915_hangman.c | 1 +
> 5 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 lib/igt_store.c
> create mode 100644 lib/igt_store.h
>
> diff --git a/lib/igt_store.c b/lib/igt_store.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..42c888b55
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/lib/igt_store.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
> +/*
> + * Copyright © 2021 Intel Corporation
> + */
> +
> +#include "i915/gem_create.h"
> +#include "igt_core.h"
> +#include "drmtest.h"
> +#include "igt_store.h"
> +#include "intel_chipset.h"
> +#include "intel_reg.h"
> +#include "ioctl_wrappers.h"
> +#include "lib/intel_allocator.h"
> +
> +/**
> + * SECTION:igt_store_word
> + * @short_description: Library for writing a value to memory
> + * @title: StoreWord
> + * @include: igt.h
> + *
> + * A lot of igt testcases need some mechanism for writing a value to memory
> + * as a test that a batch buffer has executed.
> + *
> + * NB: Requires master for STORE_DWORD on gen4/5.
> + */
> +void igt_store_word(int fd, uint64_t ahnd, const intel_ctx_t *ctx,
> + const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e,
> + int fence, uint32_t target_handle,
> + uint64_t target_gpu_addr,
> + uint64_t store_offset, uint32_t store_value)
> +{
> + const int SCRATCH = 0;
> + const int BATCH = 1;
> + const unsigned int gen = intel_gen(intel_get_drm_devid(fd));
> + struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 obj[2];
> + struct drm_i915_gem_relocation_entry reloc;
> + struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 execbuf;
> + uint32_t batch[16], delta;
> + uint64_t bb_offset;
> + int i;
> +
> + memset(&execbuf, 0, sizeof(execbuf));
> + execbuf.buffers_ptr = to_user_pointer(obj);
> + execbuf.buffer_count = ARRAY_SIZE(obj);
> + execbuf.flags = e->flags;
> + execbuf.rsvd1 = ctx->id;
> + if (fence != -1) {
> + execbuf.flags |= I915_EXEC_FENCE_IN;
> + execbuf.rsvd2 = fence;
> + }
> + if (gen < 6)
> + execbuf.flags |= I915_EXEC_SECURE;
> +
> + memset(obj, 0, sizeof(obj));
> + obj[SCRATCH].handle = target_handle;
> +
> + obj[BATCH].handle = gem_create(fd, 4096);
> + obj[BATCH].relocs_ptr = to_user_pointer(&reloc);
> + obj[BATCH].relocation_count = !ahnd ? 1 : 0;
> + bb_offset = get_offset(ahnd, obj[BATCH].handle, 4096, 0);
> + memset(&reloc, 0, sizeof(reloc));
> +
> + i = 0;
> + delta = sizeof(uint32_t) * store_offset;
Can't this overflow the delta as store_offset is a u64?
> + if (!ahnd) {
> + reloc.target_handle = obj[SCRATCH].handle;
> + reloc.presumed_offset = -1;
> + reloc.offset = sizeof(uint32_t) * (i + 1);
> + reloc.delta = delta;
> + reloc.read_domains = I915_GEM_DOMAIN_INSTRUCTION;
> + reloc.write_domain = I915_GEM_DOMAIN_INSTRUCTION;
> + } else {
> + obj[SCRATCH].offset = target_gpu_addr;
> + obj[SCRATCH].flags |= EXEC_OBJECT_PINNED | EXEC_OBJECT_WRITE;
> + obj[BATCH].offset = bb_offset;
> + obj[BATCH].flags |= EXEC_OBJECT_PINNED;
> + }
> + batch[i] = MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM | (gen < 6 ? 1 << 22 : 0);
> + if (gen >= 8) {
> + batch[++i] = target_gpu_addr + delta;
> + batch[++i] = (target_gpu_addr + delta) >> 32;
This is different from the previous code, presumably this is fixing a
bug where delta + bits 31:0 of target_gpu_addr overflows into the upper
32 bits?
Matt
> + } else if (gen >= 4) {
> + batch[++i] = 0;
> + batch[++i] = delta;
> + reloc.offset += sizeof(uint32_t);
> + } else {
> + batch[i]--;
> + batch[++i] = delta;
> + }
> + batch[++i] = store_value;
> + batch[++i] = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END;
> + gem_write(fd, obj[BATCH].handle, 0, batch, sizeof(batch));
> + gem_execbuf(fd, &execbuf);
> + gem_close(fd, obj[BATCH].handle);
> + put_offset(ahnd, obj[BATCH].handle);
> +}
> diff --git a/lib/igt_store.h b/lib/igt_store.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..5c6c8263c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/lib/igt_store.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
> +/*
> + * Copyright © 2021 Intel Corporation
> + */
> +
> +#include "igt_gt.h"
> +
> +void igt_store_word(int fd, uint64_t ahnd, const intel_ctx_t *ctx,
> + const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e,
> + int fence, uint32_t target_handle,
> + uint64_t target_gpu_addr,
> + uint64_t store_offset, uint32_t store_value);
> diff --git a/lib/meson.build b/lib/meson.build
> index b9568a71b..3e43316d1 100644
> --- a/lib/meson.build
> +++ b/lib/meson.build
> @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ lib_sources = [
> 'igt_map.c',
> 'igt_pm.c',
> 'igt_dummyload.c',
> + 'igt_store.c',
> 'uwildmat/uwildmat.c',
> 'igt_kmod.c',
> 'igt_panfrost.c',
> diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_exec_fence.c b/tests/i915/gem_exec_fence.c
> index 9a6336ce9..196236b27 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/gem_exec_fence.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/gem_exec_fence.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
> #include "i915/gem.h"
> #include "i915/gem_create.h"
> #include "igt.h"
> +#include "igt_store.h"
> #include "igt_syncobj.h"
> #include "igt_sysfs.h"
> #include "igt_vgem.h"
> @@ -57,74 +58,6 @@ struct sync_merge_data {
> #define MI_SEMAPHORE_SAD_EQ_SDD (4 << 12)
> #define MI_SEMAPHORE_SAD_NEQ_SDD (5 << 12)
>
> -static void store(int fd, uint64_t ahnd, const intel_ctx_t *ctx,
> - const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e,
> - int fence, uint32_t target, uint64_t target_offset,
> - unsigned offset_value)
> -{
> - const int SCRATCH = 0;
> - const int BATCH = 1;
> - const unsigned int gen = intel_gen(intel_get_drm_devid(fd));
> - struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 obj[2];
> - struct drm_i915_gem_relocation_entry reloc;
> - struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 execbuf;
> - uint32_t batch[16], delta;
> - uint64_t bb_offset;
> - int i;
> -
> - memset(&execbuf, 0, sizeof(execbuf));
> - execbuf.buffers_ptr = to_user_pointer(obj);
> - execbuf.buffer_count = 2;
> - execbuf.flags = e->flags | I915_EXEC_FENCE_IN;
> - execbuf.rsvd1 = ctx->id;
> - execbuf.rsvd2 = fence;
> - if (gen < 6)
> - execbuf.flags |= I915_EXEC_SECURE;
> -
> - memset(obj, 0, sizeof(obj));
> - obj[SCRATCH].handle = target;
> -
> - obj[BATCH].handle = gem_create(fd, 4096);
> - obj[BATCH].relocs_ptr = to_user_pointer(&reloc);
> - obj[BATCH].relocation_count = !ahnd ? 1 : 0;
> - bb_offset = get_offset(ahnd, obj[BATCH].handle, 4096, 0);
> - memset(&reloc, 0, sizeof(reloc));
> -
> - i = 0;
> - delta = sizeof(uint32_t) * offset_value;
> - if (!ahnd) {
> - reloc.target_handle = obj[SCRATCH].handle;
> - reloc.presumed_offset = -1;
> - reloc.offset = sizeof(uint32_t) * (i + 1);
> - reloc.delta = delta;
> - reloc.read_domains = I915_GEM_DOMAIN_INSTRUCTION;
> - reloc.write_domain = I915_GEM_DOMAIN_INSTRUCTION;
> - } else {
> - obj[SCRATCH].offset = target_offset;
> - obj[SCRATCH].flags |= EXEC_OBJECT_PINNED | EXEC_OBJECT_WRITE;
> - obj[BATCH].offset = bb_offset;
> - obj[BATCH].flags |= EXEC_OBJECT_PINNED;
> - }
> - batch[i] = MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM | (gen < 6 ? 1 << 22 : 0);
> - if (gen >= 8) {
> - batch[++i] = target_offset + delta;
> - batch[++i] = target_offset >> 32;
> - } else if (gen >= 4) {
> - batch[++i] = 0;
> - batch[++i] = delta;
> - reloc.offset += sizeof(uint32_t);
> - } else {
> - batch[i]--;
> - batch[++i] = delta;
> - }
> - batch[++i] = offset_value;
> - batch[++i] = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END;
> - gem_write(fd, obj[BATCH].handle, 0, batch, sizeof(batch));
> - gem_execbuf(fd, &execbuf);
> - gem_close(fd, obj[BATCH].handle);
> - put_offset(ahnd, obj[BATCH].handle);
> -}
> -
> static bool fence_busy(int fence)
> {
> return poll(&(struct pollfd){fence, POLLIN}, 1, 0) == 0;
> @@ -400,13 +333,13 @@ static void test_fence_await(int fd, const intel_ctx_t *ctx,
> continue;
>
> if (flags & NONBLOCK) {
> - store(fd, ahnd, ctx, e2, spin->out_fence,
> - scratch, scratch_offset, i);
> + igt_store_word(fd, ahnd, ctx, e2, spin->out_fence,
> + scratch, scratch_offset, i, i);
> } else {
> igt_fork(child, 1) {
> ahnd = get_reloc_ahnd(fd, ctx->id);
> - store(fd, ahnd, ctx, e2, spin->out_fence,
> - scratch, scratch_offset, i);
> + igt_store_word(fd, ahnd, ctx, e2, spin->out_fence,
> + scratch, scratch_offset, i, i);
> put_ahnd(ahnd);
> }
> }
> diff --git a/tests/i915/i915_hangman.c b/tests/i915/i915_hangman.c
> index 6656b3fcd..5a0c9497c 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/i915_hangman.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/i915_hangman.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
> #include "i915/gem.h"
> #include "i915/gem_create.h"
> #include "igt.h"
> +#include "igt_store.h"
> #include "igt_sysfs.h"
> #include "igt_debugfs.h"
> #include "sw_sync.h"
> --
> 2.25.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-13 20:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-13 19:59 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 i-g-t 00/15] Fixes for i915_hangman and gem_exec_capture John.C.Harrison
2022-01-13 19:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 i-g-t 01/15] tests/i915/i915_hangman: Add descriptions John.C.Harrison
2022-01-13 19:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 i-g-t 02/15] lib/hang: Fix igt_require_hang_ring to work with all engines John.C.Harrison
2022-01-13 19:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 i-g-t 03/15] tests/i915/i915_hangman: Update capture test to use engine structure John.C.Harrison
2022-01-13 19:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] " Matthew Brost
2022-01-13 19:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 i-g-t 04/15] tests/i915/i915_hangman: Explicitly test per engine reset vs full GPU reset John.C.Harrison
2022-01-13 19:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 i-g-t 05/15] tests/i915/i915_hangman: Add uevent test & fix detector John.C.Harrison
2022-01-13 19:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 i-g-t 06/15] tests/i915/i915_hangman: Use the correct context in hangcheck_unterminated John.C.Harrison
2022-01-13 20:00 ` Matthew Brost
2022-01-13 19:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 i-g-t 07/15] lib/store: Refactor common store code into helper function John.C.Harrison
2022-01-13 20:10 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2022-01-13 20:27 ` [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] " John Harrison
2022-01-13 20:23 ` Matthew Brost
2022-01-13 20:40 ` John Harrison
2022-01-13 20:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] " John.C.Harrison
2022-01-13 20:53 ` [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] " Matthew Brost
2022-01-13 19:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 i-g-t 08/15] tests/i915/i915_hangman: Add alive-ness test after error capture John.C.Harrison
2022-01-13 20:18 ` Matthew Brost
2022-01-13 23:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] " John.C.Harrison
2022-01-13 19:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 i-g-t 09/15] tests/i915/i915_hangman: Remove reliance on context persistance John.C.Harrison
2022-01-13 20:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] " Matthew Brost
2022-01-13 20:42 ` John Harrison
2022-01-13 20:38 ` Matthew Brost
2022-01-13 19:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 i-g-t 10/15] tests/i915/i915_hangman: Run background task on all engines John.C.Harrison
2022-01-13 20:48 ` Matthew Brost
2022-01-13 19:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 i-g-t 11/15] tests/i915/i915_hangman: Don't let background contexts cause a ban John.C.Harrison
2022-01-13 21:01 ` [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] " Matthew Brost
2022-01-13 21:19 ` John Harrison
2022-01-13 21:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] " John.C.Harrison
2022-01-13 22:30 ` Matthew Brost
2022-01-13 19:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 i-g-t 12/15] tests/i915/gem_exec_fence: Configure correct context John.C.Harrison
2022-01-13 21:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] " Matthew Brost
2022-01-13 21:23 ` John Harrison
2022-01-13 19:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 i-g-t 13/15] lib/i915: Add helper for non-destructive engine property updates John.C.Harrison
2022-01-13 22:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] " Matthew Brost
2022-01-13 19:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 i-g-t 14/15] tests/i915/i915_hangman: Configure engine properties for quicker hangs John.C.Harrison
2022-01-13 22:38 ` Matthew Brost
2022-01-13 19:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 i-g-t 15/15] tests/i915/gem_exec_capture: Restore engines John.C.Harrison
2022-01-13 23:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] " Matthew Brost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220113201002.GA13315@jons-linux-dev-box \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=IGT-Dev@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org \
--cc=Intel-GFX@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org \
--cc=John.C.Harrison@Intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox