From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: John Harrison <john.c.harrison@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/guc: Add work queue to trigger a GT reset
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 20:04:20 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220121040420.GA4148@jons-linux-dev-box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4eecb7af-245c-60aa-2eed-0dbb54e65189@intel.com>
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 05:34:54PM -0800, John Harrison wrote:
> On 1/19/2022 13:24, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > The G2H handler needs to be flushed during a GT reset but a G2H
> > indicating engine reset failure can trigger a GT reset. Add a worker to
> > trigger the GT when an engine reset failure is received to break this
> trigger the GT reset?
>
Yes.
> > circular dependency.
> >
> > v2:
> > (John Harrison)
> > - Store engine reset mask
> > - Fix typo in commit message
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h | 9 +++++
> > .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++--
> > 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
> > index 9d26a86fe557..c4a9fc7dd246 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
> > @@ -119,6 +119,15 @@ struct intel_guc {
> > * function as it might be in an atomic context (no sleeping)
> > */
> > struct work_struct destroyed_worker;
> > + /**
> > + * @reset_worker: worker to trigger a GT reset after an engine
> > + * reset fails
> > + */
> > + struct work_struct reset_worker;
> > + /**
> > + * @reset_mask: mask of engines that failed to reset
> > + */
> > + intel_engine_mask_t reset_mask;
> reset_fail_mask might be a less ambiguous name? Same for the worker struct
> and function.
>
How about:
struct {
worker;
mask;
} engine_reset_fail;
Matt
> John.
>
> > } submission_state;
> > /**
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> > index 3918f1be114f..514b3060b141 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> > @@ -1731,6 +1731,7 @@ void intel_guc_submission_reset_finish(struct intel_guc *guc)
> > }
> > static void destroyed_worker_func(struct work_struct *w);
> > +static void reset_worker_func(struct work_struct *w);
> > /*
> > * Set up the memory resources to be shared with the GuC (via the GGTT)
> > @@ -1761,6 +1762,8 @@ int intel_guc_submission_init(struct intel_guc *guc)
> > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&guc->submission_state.destroyed_contexts);
> > INIT_WORK(&guc->submission_state.destroyed_worker,
> > destroyed_worker_func);
> > + INIT_WORK(&guc->submission_state.reset_worker,
> > + reset_worker_func);
> > guc->submission_state.guc_ids_bitmap =
> > bitmap_zalloc(NUMBER_MULTI_LRC_GUC_ID(guc), GFP_KERNEL);
> > @@ -4026,6 +4029,26 @@ guc_lookup_engine(struct intel_guc *guc, u8 guc_class, u8 instance)
> > return gt->engine_class[engine_class][instance];
> > }
> > +static void reset_worker_func(struct work_struct *w)
> > +{
> > + struct intel_guc *guc = container_of(w, struct intel_guc,
> > + submission_state.reset_worker);
> > + struct intel_gt *gt = guc_to_gt(guc);
> > + intel_engine_mask_t reset_mask;
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&guc->submission_state.lock, flags);
> > + reset_mask = guc->submission_state.reset_mask;
> > + guc->submission_state.reset_mask = 0;
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&guc->submission_state.lock, flags);
> > +
> > + if (likely(reset_mask))
> > + intel_gt_handle_error(gt, reset_mask,
> > + I915_ERROR_CAPTURE,
> > + "GuC failed to reset engine mask=0x%x\n",
> > + reset_mask);
> > +}
> > +
> > int intel_guc_engine_failure_process_msg(struct intel_guc *guc,
> > const u32 *msg, u32 len)
> > {
> > @@ -4033,6 +4056,7 @@ int intel_guc_engine_failure_process_msg(struct intel_guc *guc,
> > struct intel_gt *gt = guc_to_gt(guc);
> > u8 guc_class, instance;
> > u32 reason;
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > if (unlikely(len != 3)) {
> > drm_err(>->i915->drm, "Invalid length %u", len);
> > @@ -4057,10 +4081,15 @@ int intel_guc_engine_failure_process_msg(struct intel_guc *guc,
> > drm_err(>->i915->drm, "GuC engine reset request failed on %d:%d (%s) because 0x%08X",
> > guc_class, instance, engine->name, reason);
> > - intel_gt_handle_error(gt, engine->mask,
> > - I915_ERROR_CAPTURE,
> > - "GuC failed to reset %s (reason=0x%08x)\n",
> > - engine->name, reason);
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&guc->submission_state.lock, flags);
> > + guc->submission_state.reset_mask |= engine->mask;
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&guc->submission_state.lock, flags);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * A GT reset flushes this worker queue (G2H handler) so we must use
> > + * another worker to trigger a GT reset.
> > + */
> > + queue_work(system_unbound_wq, &guc->submission_state.reset_worker);
> > return 0;
> > }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-21 4:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-19 21:24 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] Flush G2H handler during a GT reset Matthew Brost
2022-01-19 21:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Allocate intel_engine_coredump_alloc with ALLOW_FAIL Matthew Brost
2022-01-19 21:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/guc: Add work queue to trigger a GT reset Matthew Brost
2022-01-21 1:34 ` John Harrison
2022-01-21 4:04 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2022-01-19 21:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/guc: Flush G2H handler during " Matthew Brost
2022-01-21 1:36 ` John Harrison
2022-01-21 4:05 ` Matthew Brost
2022-01-19 23:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for Flush G2H handler during a GT reset (rev3) Patchwork
2022-01-20 0:20 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-01-20 4:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-01-21 4:31 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] Flush G2H handler during a GT reset Matthew Brost
2022-01-21 4:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/guc: Add work queue to trigger " Matthew Brost
2022-01-21 18:53 ` John Harrison
2022-01-18 21:43 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] Flush G2H handler during " Matthew Brost
2022-01-18 21:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/guc: Add work queue to trigger " Matthew Brost
2022-01-19 1:37 ` John Harrison
2022-01-19 20:54 ` Matthew Brost
2022-01-19 21:07 ` John Harrison
2022-01-19 21:05 ` Matthew Brost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220121040420.GA4148@jons-linux-dev-box \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=john.c.harrison@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox