From: Miaoqian Lin <linmq006@gmail.com>
To: matthew.brost@intel.com
Cc: linmq006@gmail.com, andi.shyti@intel.com, airlied@linux.ie,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, lucas.demarchi@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/selftests: Fix NULL vs IS_ERR checking for kernel_context
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 12:58:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220124125837.10467-1-linmq006@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220112175338.GA12463@jons-linux-dev-box>
Since i915_gem_create_context() function return error pointers,
the kernel_context() function does not return null, It returns error
pointers too. Using IS_ERR() to check the return value to fix this.
Signed-off-by: Miaoqian Lin <linmq006@gmail.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- clean up unneeded initialization of err.
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_execlists.c | 43 ++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_execlists.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_execlists.c
index b367ecfa42de..0d453ddcede4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_execlists.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_execlists.c
@@ -1531,7 +1531,7 @@ static int live_busywait_preempt(void *arg)
struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
struct i915_vma *vma;
enum intel_engine_id id;
- int err = -ENOMEM;
+ int err;
u32 *map;
/*
@@ -1540,13 +1540,16 @@ static int live_busywait_preempt(void *arg)
*/
ctx_hi = kernel_context(gt->i915, NULL);
- if (!ctx_hi)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ if (IS_ERR(ctx_hi))
+ return IS_ERR(ctx_hi);
+
ctx_hi->sched.priority = I915_CONTEXT_MAX_USER_PRIORITY;
ctx_lo = kernel_context(gt->i915, NULL);
- if (!ctx_lo)
+ if (IS_ERR(ctx_lo)) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(ctx_lo);
goto err_ctx_hi;
+ }
ctx_lo->sched.priority = I915_CONTEXT_MIN_USER_PRIORITY;
obj = i915_gem_object_create_internal(gt->i915, PAGE_SIZE);
@@ -1742,13 +1745,17 @@ static int live_preempt(void *arg)
goto err_spin_hi;
ctx_hi = kernel_context(gt->i915, NULL);
- if (!ctx_hi)
+ if (IS_ERR(ctx_hi)) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(ctx_hi);
goto err_spin_lo;
+ }
ctx_hi->sched.priority = I915_CONTEXT_MAX_USER_PRIORITY;
ctx_lo = kernel_context(gt->i915, NULL);
- if (!ctx_lo)
+ if (IS_ERR(ctx_lo)) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(ctx_lo);
goto err_ctx_hi;
+ }
ctx_lo->sched.priority = I915_CONTEXT_MIN_USER_PRIORITY;
for_each_engine(engine, gt, id) {
@@ -1834,12 +1841,16 @@ static int live_late_preempt(void *arg)
goto err_spin_hi;
ctx_hi = kernel_context(gt->i915, NULL);
- if (!ctx_hi)
+ if (IS_ERR(ctx_hi)) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(ctx_hi);
goto err_spin_lo;
+ }
ctx_lo = kernel_context(gt->i915, NULL);
- if (!ctx_lo)
+ if (IS_ERR(ctx_lo)) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(ctx_lo);
goto err_ctx_hi;
+ }
/* Make sure ctx_lo stays before ctx_hi until we trigger preemption. */
ctx_lo->sched.priority = 1;
@@ -1928,8 +1939,8 @@ struct preempt_client {
static int preempt_client_init(struct intel_gt *gt, struct preempt_client *c)
{
c->ctx = kernel_context(gt->i915, NULL);
- if (!c->ctx)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ if (IS_ERR(c->ctx))
+ return PTR_ERR(c->ctx);
if (igt_spinner_init(&c->spin, gt))
goto err_ctx;
@@ -3385,13 +3396,17 @@ static int live_preempt_timeout(void *arg)
return -ENOMEM;
ctx_hi = kernel_context(gt->i915, NULL);
- if (!ctx_hi)
+ if (IS_ERR(ctx_hi)) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(ctx_hi);
goto err_spin_lo;
+ }
ctx_hi->sched.priority = I915_CONTEXT_MAX_USER_PRIORITY;
ctx_lo = kernel_context(gt->i915, NULL);
- if (!ctx_lo)
+ if (IS_ERR(ctx_lo)) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(ctx_lo);
goto err_ctx_hi;
+ }
ctx_lo->sched.priority = I915_CONTEXT_MIN_USER_PRIORITY;
for_each_engine(engine, gt, id) {
@@ -3683,8 +3698,10 @@ static int live_preempt_smoke(void *arg)
for (n = 0; n < smoke.ncontext; n++) {
smoke.contexts[n] = kernel_context(smoke.gt->i915, NULL);
- if (!smoke.contexts[n])
+ if (IS_ERR(smoke.contexts[n])) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(smoke.contexts[n]);
goto err_ctx;
+ }
}
for (n = 0; n < ARRAY_SIZE(phase); n++) {
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-24 13:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-22 7:58 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: Fix NULL vs IS_ERR checking for kernel_context Miaoqian Lin
2022-01-10 19:16 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2022-01-11 1:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2022-01-12 17:53 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Matthew Brost
2022-01-24 12:58 ` Miaoqian Lin [this message]
2022-01-24 21:03 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/selftests: Fix NULL vs IS_ERR checking for kernel_context (rev2) Patchwork
2022-01-25 2:08 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220124125837.10467-1-linmq006@gmail.com \
--to=linmq006@gmail.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=andi.shyti@intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox