From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE2CAC433F5 for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 05:02:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6940010F2CB; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 05:01:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga18.intel.com (mga18.intel.com [134.134.136.126]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2BFF10F2CA; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 05:01:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1643346118; x=1674882118; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=RO9ZZxmjqCuKF+rRhN0z+oMjHUed1ETrae8AqmGHMHw=; b=n3qIbAeABicvEIAyKluOA/YE79RNqku9liLx9vOkYS/nP3ZlJGbZY5jl Qo/V54qZYoSXMkOludFp7zWZUun+3neajGjz/IWgYrR2UOQ7ZdQIrQE+v fhVpkl4zZYpDbBoyZuk/y0HR2yuY4yL/NpNZSy9z++zouJON9d94yahOt wNblf0+5M8nUr/imA94bAXTfSE29V95bUk0PS8e4nMd8LKB20btDuDDuH 7diz5SzBrQCcxme8fwpcV/zf2ouQGj+Dt5fH+Ci1OzlYbuEMF1Bvx8ClY ChriSsEf0/bG2AN1hmFoQ4GFEjNws3pMJxqKzvbUyH7Jcf6VJ+ltQDXLR A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10240"; a="230623852" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,322,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="230623852" Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Jan 2022 21:01:57 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,322,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="628984302" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 276f1b88eecb) ([10.239.97.150]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Jan 2022 21:01:54 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 276f1b88eecb with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nDJOU-000NUt-82; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 05:01:54 +0000 Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 13:01:11 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Zhi Wang , hch@lst.de, jgg@nvidia.com, jani.nikula@linux.intel.com Message-ID: <20220128050111.GA69282@e2c1dfe2c692> References: <20220127120508.11330-1-zhi.a.wang@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220127120508.11330-1-zhi.a.wang@intel.com> X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Subject: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH] i915/gvt: intel_gvt_match_device() can be static X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, Zhi Wang , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Terrence Xu , intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/handlers.c:45:6: warning: symbol 'intel_gvt_match_device' was not declared. Should it be static? Reported-by: kernel test robot Signed-off-by: kernel test robot --- handlers.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/handlers.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/handlers.c index dad31ad074a03..459f0d902f64f 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/handlers.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/handlers.c @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ #include "display/intel_display_types.h" #include "display/intel_fbc.h" -bool intel_gvt_match_device(struct intel_gvt *gvt, +static bool intel_gvt_match_device(struct intel_gvt *gvt, unsigned long device) { return intel_gvt_get_device_type(gvt->gt->i915) & device;