From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2FE6C433FE for ; Mon, 3 Oct 2022 11:15:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 304D910E304; Mon, 3 Oct 2022 11:15:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEAE010E2E7 for ; Mon, 3 Oct 2022 11:15:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1664795748; x=1696331748; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding; bh=OIaaWaD145pXFHAxS6ULlwXtCMfy5pJY3W1j4HzvAn8=; b=XWfxzbvM2syWUJxPw/8OJxaGn97n74RbIz/JUXUZdEccZbS0CALFVAVK fXo3UukeXS9jIrNiiNtk5GhgRqyZ13sCgET0SKe74RAWzdNGKt9F51bN2 Eg7c+Ho5pNQSf8o1hiBlb0TT8GaaSPh/1/FL5i03TbTjOYoxBNIMQT00B jcT12EHxj8T+lvwA6/KrP9osBc5wrS/kLtdKTYAAUv+RNXryW6tJo34kq y3So/MC7KdZWr+lXLgUFCxqYxjXSx++JHUApiRAHEl3jNSsK3a6vG9v1s XdSHHqeW+MSvhlDe1GMGePjuIP+wudr5u4/LH9jHQ1GgAGpsvneABL5R3 w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10488"; a="366650627" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,365,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="366650627" Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Oct 2022 04:15:47 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10488"; a="618696678" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,365,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="618696678" Received: from stinkpipe.fi.intel.com (HELO stinkbox) ([10.237.72.191]) by orsmga007.jf.intel.com with SMTP; 03 Oct 2022 04:15:45 -0700 Received: by stinkbox (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 03 Oct 2022 14:15:44 +0300 From: Ville Syrjala To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2022 14:15:38 +0300 Message-Id: <20221003111544.8007-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.35.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/6] drm/i915: Fix watermark calculations with various CCS modifiers X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" From: Ville Syrjälä We are neglegting to consider all the new CCS modifiers as Y-tiled in the watermark calculations. So we are incorrectrly calculation the watermarks as if dealing with a linear surface. v2: Fix tgl RC CCS vs. MC CCS to separate patches since they need separate fixes tags Ville Syrjälä (6): drm/i915: Fix watermark calculations for gen12+ RC CCS modifier drm/i915: Fix watermark calculations for gen12+ MC CCS modifier drm/i915: Fix watermark calculations for gen12+ CCS+CC modifier drm/i915: Fix watermark calculations for DG2 CCS modifiers drm/i915: Fix watermark calculations for DG2 CCS+CC modifier drm/i915: Simplify modifier lookup in watermark code drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb.c | 13 +++++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb.h | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c | 10 +++------- 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) -- 2.35.1