From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93DEDEB64D0 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 14:17:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A80110E25F; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 14:17:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C32410E264 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 14:17:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1686665818; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=NYatJhHx6nSYO+TZbVqZK7LDirziHUeBGTIfum2S5Mk=; b=c1jIMounNGmx2LCy9u+tRu3C7rVEvFA+TLYqxkNdjOYSEhoIxdmi69ckrp0wUIbFPPHdh0 l5B2YUyHCiwWVGPrzO+5Vh0YejGS+/DYddWdK20HfTCvJPNRFGgk520bdwz1AWLmP3ORoy UtEZJiIrrzqzx+hbC0jzLoNB5k2iuvY= Received: from mail-io1-f69.google.com (mail-io1-f69.google.com [209.85.166.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-551-265QyHGLPhmvU0_UYInwvg-1; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 10:16:56 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 265QyHGLPhmvU0_UYInwvg-1 Received: by mail-io1-f69.google.com with SMTP id ca18e2360f4ac-77ac4aa24eeso617312239f.1 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 07:16:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1686665810; x=1689257810; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=NYatJhHx6nSYO+TZbVqZK7LDirziHUeBGTIfum2S5Mk=; b=O4gIMoJngXrclSR1RKMO/zvIqxAOxOONOqTeoBf8QlVSMHDi0PE0ODUOKmDuob3K+2 SrUm0zyB2e1/ABjmLxCNfu2A5oBxGrxvOdq/j7a+O4Gc2wbdK/dR9TRE0bOH3hOgB70S bLfrtd4IWS5C2uOa5vqKgeG7gbhmMJBk70dJSmOCC7ktW+eo1FYSKs7a8y7+ufUZTlhM HrOd4tUwVhleKpOhLgTtRRgsKCTh2IVtH8OP++/o+0zqBdesZFfvnDfEAdVrRPkfIu44 7HBJgwZ77swjyDpF5zZH22d3z5XEargjoyqpv1601ub718pkiyNjqlV7+tfC7AZRM/e+ Sx+Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDwLCV+KTs9Wfvo96gINW7DYLCCaRRShkaiGHtr+SKplDF/Mzh8Z ILaMADTGU8cvk+BKYE6TGPnWnfsvaBSM4BcGQ39BbXiHfS5Ux0JRTqYMIh4KLGOTVYyZnquwFnq 0IULe3kUJ/kq7vZGj8mwApM2Y4EQE X-Received: by 2002:a92:d409:0:b0:338:a648:9c8 with SMTP id q9-20020a92d409000000b00338a64809c8mr9928844ilm.17.1686665809837; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 07:16:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ4dvOnTcWtOwv+q2/EoekGwnRzAO73yzLn1NP0J05Lkv0h5eXb2N1tj6bmPqmEs9rHHcJOL2Q== X-Received: by 2002:a92:d409:0:b0:338:a648:9c8 with SMTP id q9-20020a92d409000000b00338a64809c8mr9928794ilm.17.1686665809492; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 07:16:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from redhat.com ([38.15.36.239]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g5-20020a92d7c5000000b003383276d260sm3827903ilq.40.2023.06.13.07.16.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 13 Jun 2023 07:16:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 08:16:47 -0600 From: Alex Williamson To: "Liu, Yi L" Message-ID: <20230613081647.740f5217.alex.williamson@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20230602121653.80017-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com> <20230602121653.80017-8-yi.l.liu@intel.com> <20230612155210.5fd3579f.alex.williamson@redhat.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.35; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 07/24] vfio: Block device access via device fd until device is opened X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "mjrosato@linux.ibm.com" , "jasowang@redhat.com" , "Hao, Xudong" , "Duan, Zhenzhong" , "peterx@redhat.com" , "Xu, Terrence" , "chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com" , "linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "lulu@redhat.com" , "Jiang, Yanting" , "joro@8bytes.org" , "nicolinc@nvidia.com" , "jgg@nvidia.com" , "Tian, Kevin" , "Zhao, Yan Y" , "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" , "eric.auger@redhat.com" , "intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org" , "yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com" , "clegoate@redhat.com" , "cohuck@redhat.com" , "shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com" , "suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com" , "robin.murphy@arm.com" Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On Tue, 13 Jun 2023 05:46:32 +0000 "Liu, Yi L" wrote: > > From: Alex Williamson > > Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2023 5:52 AM > > > > On Fri, 2 Jun 2023 05:16:36 -0700 > > Yi Liu wrote: > > > > > Allow the vfio_device file to be in a state where the device FD is > > > opened but the device cannot be used by userspace (i.e. its .open_device() > > > hasn't been called). This inbetween state is not used when the device > > > FD is spawned from the group FD, however when we create the device FD > > > directly by opening a cdev it will be opened in the blocked state. > > > > > > The reason for the inbetween state is that userspace only gets a FD but > > > doesn't gain access permission until binding the FD to an iommufd. So in > > > the blocked state, only the bind operation is allowed. Completing bind > > > will allow user to further access the device. > > > > > > This is implemented by adding a flag in struct vfio_device_file to mark > > > the blocked state and using a simple smp_load_acquire() to obtain the > > > flag value and serialize all the device setup with the thread accessing > > > this device. > > > > > > Following this lockless scheme, it can safely handle the device FD > > > unbound->bound but it cannot handle bound->unbound. To allow this we'd > > > need to add a lock on all the vfio ioctls which seems costly. So once > > > device FD is bound, it remains bound until the FD is closed. > > > > > > Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe > > > Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian > > > Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe > > > Reviewed-by: Eric Auger > > > Tested-by: Terrence Xu > > > Tested-by: Nicolin Chen > > > Tested-by: Matthew Rosato > > > Tested-by: Yanting Jiang > > > Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum > > > Signed-off-by: Yi Liu > > > --- > > > drivers/vfio/group.c | 11 ++++++++++- > > > drivers/vfio/vfio.h | 1 + > > > drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > > > 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/group.c b/drivers/vfio/group.c > > > index caf53716ddb2..088dd34c8931 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/vfio/group.c > > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/group.c > > > @@ -194,9 +194,18 @@ static int vfio_df_group_open(struct vfio_device_file *df) > > > df->iommufd = device->group->iommufd; > > > > > > ret = vfio_df_open(df); > > > - if (ret) > > > + if (ret) { > > > df->iommufd = NULL; > > > + goto out_put_kvm; > > > + } > > > + > > > + /* > > > + * Paired with smp_load_acquire() in vfio_device_fops::ioctl/ > > > + * read/write/mmap and vfio_file_has_device_access() > > > + */ > > > + smp_store_release(&df->access_granted, true); > > > > > > +out_put_kvm: > > > if (device->open_count == 0) > > > vfio_device_put_kvm(device); > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h > > > index f9eb52eb9ed7..fdf2fc73f880 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h > > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h > > > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ struct vfio_container; > > > > > > struct vfio_device_file { > > > struct vfio_device *device; > > > + bool access_granted; > > > > Should we make this a more strongly defined data type and later move > > devid (u32) here to partially fill the hole created? > > Before your question, let me describe how I place the fields > of this structure to see if it is common practice. The first two > fields are static, so they are in the beginning. The access_granted > is lockless and other fields are protected by locks. So I tried to > put the lock and the fields it protects closely. So this is why I put > devid behind iommufd as both are protected by the same lock. I think the primary considerations are locality and compactness. Hot paths data should be within the first cache line of the structure, related data should share a cache line, and we should use the space efficiently. What you describe seems largely an aesthetic concern, which was not evident to me by the segmentation alone. > struct vfio_device_file { > struct vfio_device *device; > struct vfio_group *group; > > bool access_granted; > spinlock_t kvm_ref_lock; /* protect kvm field */ > struct kvm *kvm; > struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd; /* protected by struct vfio_device_set::lock */ > u32 devid; /* only valid when iommufd is valid */ > }; > > > > > I think this is being placed towards the front of the data structure > > for cache line locality given this is a hot path for file operations. > > But bool types have an implementation dependent size, making them > > difficult to pack. Also there will be a tendency to want to make this > > a bit field, which is probably not compatible with the smp lockless > > operations being used here. We might get in front of these issues if > > we just define it as a u8 now. Thanks, > > Not quite get why bit field is going to be incompatible with smp > lockless operations. Could you elaborate a bit? And should I define > the access_granted as u8 or "u8:1"? Perhaps FUD on my part, but load-acquire type operations have specific semantics and it's not clear to me that they interest with compiler generated bit operations. Thanks, Alex > > > spinlock_t kvm_ref_lock; /* protect kvm field */ > > > struct kvm *kvm; > > > struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd; /* protected by struct vfio_device_set::lock */ > > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c > > > index a3c5817fc545..4c8b7713dc3d 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c > > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c > > > @@ -1129,6 +1129,10 @@ static long vfio_device_fops_unl_ioctl(struct file *filep, > > > struct vfio_device *device = df->device; > > > int ret; > > > > > > + /* Paired with smp_store_release() following vfio_df_open() */ > > > + if (!smp_load_acquire(&df->access_granted)) > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > + > > > ret = vfio_device_pm_runtime_get(device); > > > if (ret) > > > return ret; > > > @@ -1156,6 +1160,10 @@ static ssize_t vfio_device_fops_read(struct file *filep, char > > __user *buf, > > > struct vfio_device_file *df = filep->private_data; > > > struct vfio_device *device = df->device; > > > > > > + /* Paired with smp_store_release() following vfio_df_open() */ > > > + if (!smp_load_acquire(&df->access_granted)) > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > + > > > if (unlikely(!device->ops->read)) > > > return -EINVAL; > > > > > > @@ -1169,6 +1177,10 @@ static ssize_t vfio_device_fops_write(struct file *filep, > > > struct vfio_device_file *df = filep->private_data; > > > struct vfio_device *device = df->device; > > > > > > + /* Paired with smp_store_release() following vfio_df_open() */ > > > + if (!smp_load_acquire(&df->access_granted)) > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > + > > > if (unlikely(!device->ops->write)) > > > return -EINVAL; > > > > > > @@ -1180,6 +1192,10 @@ static int vfio_device_fops_mmap(struct file *filep, struct > > vm_area_struct *vma) > > > struct vfio_device_file *df = filep->private_data; > > > struct vfio_device *device = df->device; > > > > > > + /* Paired with smp_store_release() following vfio_df_open() */ > > > + if (!smp_load_acquire(&df->access_granted)) > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > + > > > if (unlikely(!device->ops->mmap)) > > > return -EINVAL; > > > >