From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 082ECC0218B for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2025 18:35:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FF4810E3F4; Thu, 23 Jan 2025 18:35:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: gabe.freedesktop.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=linux.org.uk header.i=@linux.org.uk header.b="RPof37F8"; dkim-atps=neutral X-Greylist: delayed 1001 seconds by postgrey-1.36 at gabe; Thu, 23 Jan 2025 18:35:37 UTC Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk (zeniv.linux.org.uk [62.89.141.173]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8387510E890; Thu, 23 Jan 2025 18:35:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.org.uk; s=zeniv-20220401; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=dUIhvDzfyx6DZiieDRrmXrYPXvuQKjnVvYWf8/UJhYg=; b=RPof37F8PUWbZ8CLf/8/4///7c fJK5I6gcZR8qFUFYL5fLdOmZ+SDYzOZcURCwvh+9cYMyCEEh0KY9b35Y7buHToqzttGlCOfrOD2q0 CBKmSnJs3oaPt0ZjxB+AtDGL9APRVEUk0UwOUDzWJ8B3VP72rJBfCnibT8MN8haig8/PEpb0sdObo KpCV93cXvr+0u78GQUINTQlRZicotvl7cSX7H5UceSk4CvJmYlOzbSif8XKq2L3LHNbjJLYJk5fkG 1sh7zuKP39ZQAlisCgsMS5pyE7THkxGdAuLp6be5uE8N8wlIZBiRZ6GyAQxd6rZF782/rC6p1fch5 m+7W6NIw==; Received: from viro by zeniv.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tb1n3-000000092eO-1ti5; Thu, 23 Jan 2025 18:18:53 +0000 Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 18:18:53 +0000 From: Al Viro To: "Borah, Chaitanya Kumar" Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" , "intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" , "Kurmi, Suresh Kumar" , "Saarinen, Jani" , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: Regression on linux-next (next-20250120) Message-ID: <20250123181853.GC1977892@ZenIV> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 03:41:08PM +0000, Borah, Chaitanya Kumar wrote: > Hello Al, > > Hope you are doing well. I am Chaitanya from the linux graphics team in Intel. > > This mail is regarding a regression we are seeing in our CI runs[1] on linux-next repository. > > Since the version next-20250120 [2], we are seeing the following regression Ugh... To narrow the things down, could you see if replacing fsd = kmalloc(sizeof(*fsd), GFP_KERNEL); with fsd = kzalloc(sizeof(*fsd), GFP_KERNEL); in fs/debugfs/file.c:__debugfs_file_get() affects the test?