intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com,
	Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>,
	Mitul Golani <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 02/12] drm/i915/skl_watermark: Pass linetime as argument to latency helpers
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 18:05:38 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250825123548.3022474-3-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250825123548.3022474-1-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>

Refactor dsc_prefill_latency and scaler_prefill_latency to take
linetime as an explicit parameter instead of computing it internally.

This avoids redundant calculations and simplifies scanline conversion
logic in skl_is_vblank_too_short().

This change also facilitates future extraction of these helpers for use
cases where latencies are computed for an optimized guardband, based on the
highest resolution mode, rather than the current mode.

Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mitul Golani <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c | 18 ++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
index a803e028e1ba..e3c45a998e37 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
@@ -2176,13 +2176,11 @@ cdclk_prefill_adjustment(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
 }
 
 static int
-dsc_prefill_latency(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
+dsc_prefill_latency(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, int linetime)
 {
 	struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
 	const struct intel_crtc_scaler_state *scaler_state =
 					&crtc_state->scaler_state;
-	int linetime = DIV_ROUND_UP(1000 * crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.htotal,
-				    crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.clock);
 	int num_scaler_users = hweight32(scaler_state->scaler_users);
 	int chroma_downscaling_factor =
 		crtc_state->output_format == INTEL_OUTPUT_FORMAT_YCBCR420 ? 4 : 1;
@@ -2206,18 +2204,16 @@ dsc_prefill_latency(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
 
 	dsc_prefill_latency *= cdclk_prefill_adjustment(crtc_state);
 
-	return intel_usecs_to_scanlines(&crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode, dsc_prefill_latency);
+	return dsc_prefill_latency;
 }
 
 static int
-scaler_prefill_latency(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
+scaler_prefill_latency(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, int linetime)
 {
 	const struct intel_crtc_scaler_state *scaler_state =
 					&crtc_state->scaler_state;
 	int num_scaler_users = hweight32(scaler_state->scaler_users);
 	int scaler_prefill_latency = 0;
-	int linetime = DIV_ROUND_UP(1000 * crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.htotal,
-				    crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.clock);
 
 	if (!num_scaler_users)
 		return scaler_prefill_latency;
@@ -2238,7 +2234,7 @@ scaler_prefill_latency(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
 
 	scaler_prefill_latency *= cdclk_prefill_adjustment(crtc_state);
 
-	return intel_usecs_to_scanlines(&crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode, scaler_prefill_latency);
+	return scaler_prefill_latency;
 }
 
 static bool
@@ -2247,11 +2243,13 @@ skl_is_vblank_too_short(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
 {
 	const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode =
 		&crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode;
+	int linetime = DIV_ROUND_UP(1000 * adjusted_mode->htotal,
+				    adjusted_mode->clock);
 
 	return crtc_state->framestart_delay +
 		intel_usecs_to_scanlines(adjusted_mode, latency) +
-		scaler_prefill_latency(crtc_state) +
-		dsc_prefill_latency(crtc_state) +
+		DIV_ROUND_UP(scaler_prefill_latency(crtc_state, linetime), linetime) +
+		DIV_ROUND_UP(dsc_prefill_latency(crtc_state, linetime), linetime) +
 		wm0_lines >
 		adjusted_mode->crtc_vtotal - adjusted_mode->crtc_vblank_start;
 }
-- 
2.45.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-08-25 12:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-25 12:35 [PATCH 00/12] Optimize vrr.guardband and fix LRR Ankit Nautiyal
2025-08-25 12:35 ` [PATCH 01/12] drm/i915/skl_watermark: Fix the scaling factor for chroma subsampling Ankit Nautiyal
2025-08-25 12:35 ` Ankit Nautiyal [this message]
2025-08-25 12:35 ` [PATCH 03/12] drm/i915/skl_scaler: Introduce helper for chroma downscale factor Ankit Nautiyal
2025-08-25 12:35 ` [PATCH 04/12] drm/i915/display: Extract helpers to set dsc/scaler prefill latencies Ankit Nautiyal
2025-08-25 12:35 ` [PATCH 05/12] drm/i915/dp: Add SDP latency computation helper Ankit Nautiyal
2025-08-25 12:35 ` [PATCH 06/12] drm/i915/alpm: Add function to compute max link-wake latency Ankit Nautiyal
2025-08-25 12:35 ` [PATCH 07/12] drm/i915/vrr: Use vrr.sync_start for getting vtotal Ankit Nautiyal
2025-08-25 12:35 ` [PATCH 08/12] drm/i915/display: Add guardband check for feature latencies Ankit Nautiyal
2025-08-25 12:35 ` [PATCH 09/12] drm/i915/skl_watermark: Remove redundant latency checks from vblank validation Ankit Nautiyal
2025-08-25 12:35 ` [PATCH 10/12] drm/i915/vrr: Use static guardband to support seamless LRR switching Ankit Nautiyal
2025-08-25 12:35 ` [PATCH 11/12] drm/i915/panel: Refactor helper to get highest fixed mode Ankit Nautiyal
2025-08-25 12:35 ` [PATCH 12/12] drm/i915/vrr: Fix seamless_mn drrs for PTL Ankit Nautiyal
2025-08-25 14:31 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for Optimize vrr.guardband and fix LRR (rev7) Patchwork
2025-08-25 16:45 ` ✓ i915.CI.Full: " Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-08-20  8:04 [PATCH 00/12] Optimize vrr.guardband and fix LRR Ankit Nautiyal
2025-08-20  8:04 ` [PATCH 02/12] drm/i915/skl_watermark: Pass linetime as argument to latency helpers Ankit Nautiyal
2025-08-18  7:31 [PATCH 00/12] Optimize vrr.guardband and fix LRR Ankit Nautiyal
2025-08-18  7:31 ` [PATCH 02/12] drm/i915/skl_watermark: Pass linetime as argument to latency helpers Ankit Nautiyal
2025-08-07 11:15 [PATCH 00/12] Optimize vrr.guardband and fix LRR Ankit Nautiyal
2025-08-07 11:15 ` [PATCH 02/12] drm/i915/skl_watermark: Pass linetime as argument to latency helpers Ankit Nautiyal
2025-08-07 16:19   ` Golani, Mitulkumar Ajitkumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250825123548.3022474-3-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --to=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).