From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Egbert Eich <eich@suse.com>
Subject: Re: i915 irq storm mitigation in 3.10
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 13:18:24 +0200
Message-ID: <20977.2432.66886.902459@linux-qknr.site>
References: <2b828191fde71b2243f883e2dbb28d6d@hz6.de>
	<20130708200316.GG18285@phenom.ffwll.local>
	<d0824eeb1788ff9264382449b35a72cd@hz6.de>
	<CAKMK7uGVz=9jvOGi56_Qqz-3PYrjn35vD56qn8O8RMydn0=dcA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20972.59257.635588.597578@linux-qknr.site>
	<e39862f6eaabe578fe5493786e4c6066@hz6.de>
	<20974.26726.659962.223064@linux-qknr.site>
	<dac730d08743a0582b3936d756bb8999@hz6.de>
	<20976.55523.670477.45248@linux-qknr.site>
	<CAKMK7uGiFaAROx6Nm-MzbFW9Z76brD4cqwCBcTk8Z5f6YOh9HQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mx2.suse.de (cantor2.suse.de [195.135.220.15])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D446E5C1D
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Thu, 25 Jul 2013 04:18:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: daniel@ffwll.ch wrote on Thursday, 25 July 2013 at 11:58:25 +0200 
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Egbert Eich <eich@suse.com>, intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, Jan Niggemann <jn@hz6.de>
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

Daniel Vetter writes:
 > 
 > I've checked the docs again for gm45 and we seem to have the right
 > values. But on early gen4 (i.e. i965g/gm) the Bspec has been wrong
 > about these, so I wouldn't be surprised at all if they're wrong for
 > the digital ports on gm45, too.
 > 
 > Iirc we've already had a case like that, but there was no real
 > conclusion (and atm I can't find the bug). Can you pls try the below
 > patch (on top of Egbert's debug stuff)?
 > 
If this doesn't help, lets disable all the digital ports together for
testing.

 > 
 > 
 > Egbert I think your debug patch has fairly useful information for
 > debugging the storm code in general, can you please submit a patch
 > against drm-intel-nightly?
 > 

Will do :)

Cheers,
	Egbert.