From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HK_RANDOM_FROM,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7998C433EF for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 12:42:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96BAE60FBF for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 12:42:59 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 96BAE60FBF Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB9F06E49A; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 12:42:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DD8D6E49D; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 12:42:57 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10106"; a="222034162" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.85,292,1624345200"; d="scan'208";a="222034162" Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Sep 2021 05:42:55 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.85,292,1624345200"; d="scan'208";a="544055574" Received: from ocascan-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.213.234.116]) ([10.213.234.116]) by fmsmga003-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Sep 2021 05:42:52 -0700 To: =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_K=c3=b6nig?= , linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org Cc: daniel@ffwll.ch, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org References: <20210913131707.45639-1-christian.koenig@amd.com> <20210913131707.45639-18-christian.koenig@amd.com> From: Tvrtko Ursulin Organization: Intel Corporation UK Plc Message-ID: <23f10a18-925f-cffe-a335-3d6c745d263a@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 13:42:49 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210913131707.45639-18-christian.koenig@amd.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/26] drm/i915: use new iterator in i915_gem_object_wait_priority X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On 13/09/2021 14:16, Christian König wrote: > Simplifying the code a bit. > > Signed-off-by: Christian König > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c | 29 ++++-------------------- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c > index 13174541f6c8..e2173a55e527 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c > @@ -120,31 +120,12 @@ i915_gem_object_wait_priority(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, > unsigned int flags, > const struct i915_sched_attr *attr) > { > - struct dma_fence *excl; > - > - if (flags & I915_WAIT_ALL) { > - struct dma_fence **shared; > - unsigned int count, i; > - int ret; > - > - ret = dma_resv_get_fences(obj->base.resv, &excl, &count, > - &shared); > - if (ret) > - return ret; > - > - for (i = 0; i < count; i++) { > - i915_gem_fence_wait_priority(shared[i], attr); > - dma_fence_put(shared[i]); > - } > - > - kfree(shared); > - } else { > - excl = dma_resv_get_excl_unlocked(obj->base.resv); > - } > + struct dma_resv_cursor cursor; > + struct dma_fence *fence; > > - if (excl) { > - i915_gem_fence_wait_priority(excl, attr); > - dma_fence_put(excl); > + dma_resv_for_each_fence_unlocked(obj->base.resv, &cursor, > + flags & I915_WAIT_ALL, fence) { > + i915_gem_fence_wait_priority(fence, attr); Do you know if the RCU lock is actually held here? I tried following the KMS code paths but got lost in core helpers and driver vfuncs. Regards, Tvrtko > } > return 0; > } >