From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Praveen Paneri <praveen.paneri@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Zhe Wang <zhe1.wang@intel.com>, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] drm/i915/bxt: Broxton decoupled MMIO
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 10:59:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <274b1dd5-27c2-b309-a21d-7aa1cbb8697e@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <582AE9CE.2070908@intel.com>
On 15/11/2016 10:56, Praveen Paneri wrote:
> Hi Tvrtko,
>
> On Tuesday 15 November 2016 03:06 PM, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>>
>> On 15/11/2016 06:40, Praveen Paneri wrote:
>>> Decoupled MMIO is an alternative way to access forcewake domain
>>> registers, which requires less cycles for a single read/write and
>>> avoids frequent software forcewake.
>>> This certainly gives advantage over the forcewake as this new
>>> mechanism “decouples” CPU cycles and allow them to complete even
>>> when GT is in a CPD (frequency change) or C6 state.
>>>
>>> This can co-exist with forcewake and we will continue to use forcewake
>>> as appropriate. E.g. 64-bit register writes to avoid writing 2 dwords
>>> separately and land into funny situations.
>>>
>>> v2:
>>> - Moved platform check out of the function and got rid of duplicate
>>> functions to find out decoupled power domain (Chris)
>>> - Added a check for forcewake already held and skipped decoupled
>>> access (Chris)
>>> - Skipped writing 64 bit registers through decoupled MMIO (Chris)
>>>
>>> v3:
>>> - Improved commit message with more info on decoupled mmio (Tvrtko)
>>> - Changed decoupled operation to enum and used u32 instead of
>>> uint_32 data type for register offset (Tvrtko)
>>> - Moved HAS_DECOUPLED_MMIO to device info (Tvrtko)
>>> - Added lookup table for converting fw_engine to pd_engine (Tvrtko)
>>> - Improved __gen9_decoupled_read and __gen9_decoupled_write
>>> routines (Tvrtko)
>>>
>>> v4:
>>> - Fixed alignment and variable names (Chris)
>>> - Write GEN9_DECOUPLED_REG0_DW1 register in just one go (Zhe Wang)
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zhe Wang <zhe1.wang@intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Praveen Paneri <praveen.paneri@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 18 +++++-
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c | 1 +
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 7 +++
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 109
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 4 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>>> index 4e7148a..158f05c 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>>> @@ -549,6 +549,18 @@ enum forcewake_domains {
>>> #define FW_REG_READ (1)
>>> #define FW_REG_WRITE (2)
>>>
>>> +enum decoupled_power_domain {
>>> + GEN9_DECOUPLED_PD_BLITTER = 0,
>>> + GEN9_DECOUPLED_PD_RENDER,
>>> + GEN9_DECOUPLED_PD_MEDIA,
>>> + GEN9_DECOUPLED_PD_ALL
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +enum decoupled_ops {
>>> + GEN9_DECOUPLED_OP_WRITE = 0,
>>> + GEN9_DECOUPLED_OP_READ
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> enum forcewake_domains
>>> intel_uncore_forcewake_for_reg(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>>> i915_reg_t reg, unsigned int op);
>>> @@ -683,7 +695,8 @@ struct intel_csr {
>>> func(cursor_needs_physical); \
>>> func(hws_needs_physical); \
>>> func(overlay_needs_physical); \
>>> - func(supports_tv)
>>> + func(supports_tv); \
>>> + func(has_decoupled_mmio)
>>>
>>> struct sseu_dev_info {
>>> u8 slice_mask;
>>> @@ -2652,6 +2665,9 @@ struct drm_i915_cmd_table {
>>> #define GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER 50
>>> #define GEN9_FREQ_SCALER 3
>>>
>>> +#define HAS_DECOUPLED_MMIO(dev) (INTEL_INFO(dev)->has_decoupled_mmio \
>>> + && IS_BXT_REVID(dev, BXT_REVID_C0, REVID_FOREVER))
>>> +
>>
>> Looks like I've missed this before, but Would you mind renaming the dev
>> argument to dev_priv?
>>
>>> #include "i915_trace.h"
>>>
>>> static inline bool intel_scanout_needs_vtd_wa(struct drm_i915_private
>>> *dev_priv)
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
>>> index 70a99ce..fce8e19 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
>>> @@ -363,6 +363,7 @@
>>> .has_hw_contexts = 1,
>>> .has_logical_ring_contexts = 1,
>>> .has_guc = 1,
>>> + .has_decoupled_mmio = 1,
>>> .ddb_size = 512,
>>> GEN_DEFAULT_PIPEOFFSETS,
>>> IVB_CURSOR_OFFSETS,
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>>> index 3361d7f..c70c07a 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>>> @@ -7342,6 +7342,13 @@ enum {
>>> #define SKL_FUSE_PG1_DIST_STATUS (1<<26)
>>> #define SKL_FUSE_PG2_DIST_STATUS (1<<25)
>>>
>>> +/* Decoupled MMIO register pair for kernel driver */
>>> +#define GEN9_DECOUPLED_REG0_DW0 _MMIO(0xF00)
>>> +#define GEN9_DECOUPLED_REG0_DW1 _MMIO(0xF04)
>>> +#define GEN9_DECOUPLED_DW1_GO (1<<31)
>>> +#define GEN9_DECOUPLED_PD_SHIFT 28
>>> +#define GEN9_DECOUPLED_OP_SHIFT 24
>>> +
>>> /* Per-pipe DDI Function Control */
>>> #define _TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL_A 0x60400
>>> #define _TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL_B 0x61400
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
>>> index e2b188d..e4c50cb 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
>>> @@ -831,6 +831,66 @@ static bool is_gen8_shadowed(u32 offset)
>>> __unclaimed_reg_debug(dev_priv, reg, read, before);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static const enum decoupled_power_domain fw2dpd_domain[] = {
>>> + GEN9_DECOUPLED_PD_RENDER,
>>> + GEN9_DECOUPLED_PD_BLITTER,
>>> + GEN9_DECOUPLED_PD_ALL,
>>> + GEN9_DECOUPLED_PD_MEDIA,
>>> + GEN9_DECOUPLED_PD_ALL,
>>> + GEN9_DECOUPLED_PD_ALL,
>>> + GEN9_DECOUPLED_PD_ALL
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> + * Decoupled MMIO access for only 1 DWORD
>>> + */
>>> +static void __gen9_decoupled_mmio_access(struct drm_i915_private
>>> *dev_priv,
>>> + u32 reg,
>>> + enum forcewake_domains fw_domain,
>>> + enum decoupled_ops operation)
>>> +{
>>> + enum decoupled_power_domain dp_domain;
>>> + u32 ctrl_reg_data = 0;
>>> +
>>> + dp_domain = fw2dpd_domain[fw_domain - 1];
>>> +
>>> + ctrl_reg_data |= reg;
>>> + ctrl_reg_data |= (operation << GEN9_DECOUPLED_OP_SHIFT);
>>> + ctrl_reg_data |= (dp_domain << GEN9_DECOUPLED_PD_SHIFT);
>>> + ctrl_reg_data |= GEN9_DECOUPLED_DW1_GO;
>>> + __raw_i915_write32(dev_priv, GEN9_DECOUPLED_REG0_DW1,
>>> ctrl_reg_data);
>>> +
>>> + if (wait_for_atomic((__raw_i915_read32(dev_priv,
>>> + GEN9_DECOUPLED_REG0_DW1) &
>>> + GEN9_DECOUPLED_DW1_GO) == 0,
>>> + FORCEWAKE_ACK_TIMEOUT_MS))
>>> + DRM_ERROR("Decoupled MMIO wait timed out\n");
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static inline u32
>>> +__gen9_decoupled_mmio_read32(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>>> + u32 reg,
>>> + enum forcewake_domains fw_domain)
>>> +{
>>> + __gen9_decoupled_mmio_access(dev_priv, reg, fw_domain,
>>> + GEN9_DECOUPLED_OP_READ);
>>> +
>>> + return __raw_i915_read32(dev_priv, GEN9_DECOUPLED_REG0_DW0);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static inline void
>>> +__gen9_decoupled_mmio_write(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>>> + u32 reg, u32 data,
>>> + enum forcewake_domains fw_domain)
>>> +{
>>> +
>>> + __raw_i915_write32(dev_priv, GEN9_DECOUPLED_REG0_DW0, data);
>>> +
>>> + __gen9_decoupled_mmio_access(dev_priv, reg, fw_domain,
>>> + GEN9_DECOUPLED_OP_WRITE);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +
>>> #define GEN2_READ_HEADER(x) \
>>> u##x val = 0; \
>>> assert_rpm_wakelock_held(dev_priv);
>>> @@ -935,6 +995,28 @@ static inline void __force_wake_auto(struct
>>> drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>>> GEN6_READ_FOOTER; \
>>> }
>>>
>>> +#define __gen9_decoupled_read(x) \
>>> +static u##x \
>>> +gen9_decoupled_read##x(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, \
>>> + i915_reg_t reg, bool trace) { \
>>> + enum forcewake_domains fw_engine; \
>>> + GEN6_READ_HEADER(x); \
>>> + fw_engine = __fwtable_reg_read_fw_domains(offset); \
>>> + if (fw_engine & ~dev_priv->uncore.fw_domains_active) { \
>>> + unsigned i; \
>>> + u32 *ptr_data = (u32 *) &val; \
>>> + for (i = 0; i < x/32; i++, offset += sizeof(u32), ptr_data++) \
>>> + *ptr_data = __gen9_decoupled_mmio_read32(dev_priv, \
>>> + offset, \
>>> + fw_engine); \
>>> + } else { \
>>> + val = __raw_i915_read##x(dev_priv, reg); \
>>> + } \
>>> + GEN6_READ_FOOTER; \
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +__gen9_decoupled_read(32)
>>> +__gen9_decoupled_read(64)
>>> __fwtable_read(8)
>>> __fwtable_read(16)
>>> __fwtable_read(32)
>>> @@ -1064,6 +1146,25 @@ static inline void __force_wake_auto(struct
>>> drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>>> GEN6_WRITE_FOOTER; \
>>> }
>>>
>>> +#define __gen9_decoupled_write(x) \
>>> +static void \
>>> +gen9_decoupled_write##x(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, \
>>> + i915_reg_t reg, u##x val, \
>>> + bool trace) { \
>>> + enum forcewake_domains fw_engine; \
>>> + GEN6_WRITE_HEADER; \
>>> + fw_engine = __fwtable_reg_write_fw_domains(offset); \
>>> + if (fw_engine & ~dev_priv->uncore.fw_domains_active) \
>>> + __gen9_decoupled_mmio_write(dev_priv, \
>>> + offset, \
>>> + val, \
>>> + fw_engine); \
>>> + else \
>>> + __raw_i915_write##x(dev_priv, reg, val); \
>>> + GEN6_WRITE_FOOTER; \
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +__gen9_decoupled_write(32)
>>> __fwtable_write(8)
>>> __fwtable_write(16)
>>> __fwtable_write(32)
>>> @@ -1287,6 +1388,14 @@ void intel_uncore_init(struct drm_i915_private
>>> *dev_priv)
>>> ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(__gen9_fw_ranges);
>>> ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(fwtable);
>>> ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(fwtable);
>>> + if (HAS_DECOUPLED_MMIO(dev_priv)) {
>>> + dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_readl =
>>> + gen9_decoupled_read32;
>>> + dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_readq =
>>> + gen9_decoupled_read64;
>>> + dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_writel =
>>> + gen9_decoupled_write32;
>>> + }
>>> break;
>>> case 8:
>>> if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv)) {
>>>
>>
>> With the rename fix above:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> Thank you for your review. Will fix the name and re send.
Chris also made a good suggestion since the HAS_DECOUPLED_MMIO is
currently different from info->has_decoupled_mmio which is confusing.
I think his idea was to edit info->has_decoupled_mmio in
intel_device_runtime_init using the stepping data and remove the same
from the macro.
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-15 10:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-06 5:24 [PATCH] drm/i915/bxt: Broxton decoupled MMIO Praveen Paneri
2016-09-06 5:51 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for " Patchwork
2016-09-06 6:36 ` [PATCH] " Chris Wilson
2016-09-19 17:05 ` Praveen Paneri
2016-09-19 17:15 ` [PATCH v2] " Praveen Paneri
2016-09-23 9:49 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-09-26 11:08 ` Paneri, Praveen
2016-09-26 20:23 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-10-04 15:46 ` [PATCH v3] " Praveen Paneri
2016-10-04 17:43 ` Vivi, Rodrigo
2016-10-04 19:56 ` Chris Wilson
2016-10-05 3:17 ` Praveen Paneri
2016-10-05 6:24 ` Praveen Paneri
2016-11-15 6:40 ` [PATCH v4] " Praveen Paneri
2016-11-15 9:36 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-11-15 10:07 ` Chris Wilson
2016-11-15 13:17 ` Praveen Paneri
2016-11-15 14:44 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-11-15 17:19 ` [PATCH v5] " Praveen Paneri
2016-11-16 8:25 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-11-16 9:03 ` Praveen Paneri
2016-11-16 9:08 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-11-16 9:18 ` Chris Wilson
2016-11-15 10:56 ` [PATCH v4] " Praveen Paneri
2016-11-15 10:59 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2016-10-05 13:50 ` [PATCH v3] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-10-10 17:03 ` [PATCH v2] " Carlos Santa
2016-09-19 17:55 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for drm/i915/bxt: Broxton decoupled MMIO (rev2) Patchwork
2016-10-04 16:19 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for drm/i915/bxt: Broxton decoupled MMIO (rev3) Patchwork
2016-11-15 7:16 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/bxt: Broxton decoupled MMIO (rev4) Patchwork
2016-11-15 18:15 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/bxt: Broxton decoupled MMIO (rev5) Patchwork
2016-11-16 9:38 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=274b1dd5-27c2-b309-a21d-7aa1cbb8697e@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=praveen.paneri@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=zhe1.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).