From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26894C433F5 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 15:02:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6559210E32E; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 15:02:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga12.intel.com (mga12.intel.com [192.55.52.136]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5804610E226; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 15:02:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1642086132; x=1673622132; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qHM7Jfjo6fSoaX6NNwxnBuSgWuEX5TxLDn1sprhq/9Q=; b=YUIc1nqyeaAd4BOsQh7MnzUnVBKRsG8mXMdZAqLMqfVZ+GDyJHNXUM72 6v/gENk69+N7EOrElFq6cbWkqCj0NnGeZ+7Zvd6BcJKSI6qoS3CetkOfS karEZ6KLutq1WSvJ6iM5mIXcKl/MaQcTyBIAfjDBaQKwdxTeKsXzZs6wm 4reKQZPviZ9U9VZl1TgjUd6beNAapw0zMcacd3iU7PqjC4GwNSX4CeYAT ochHXbaHDmJOHGbsriihZbQw+cwcCXGrV/j+GZ8bfOJBWtSVE8zl/JWwK 0tWpX041PGfWlJACvTb9jw+xbM5lPZYfsSOgrd2LZL0Ob4BsX30US5LQ1 w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10225"; a="224005829" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,286,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="224005829" Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Jan 2022 07:01:49 -0800 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,286,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="670536300" Received: from inechita-mobl2.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.249.254.193]) ([10.249.254.193]) by fmsmga001-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Jan 2022 07:01:48 -0800 Message-ID: <377b08f8-4a70-dfde-0872-032da8102fb0@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 16:01:46 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Maarten Lankhorst , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org References: <20220113114500.2039439-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> <20220113114500.2039439-6-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Thomas_Hellstr=c3=b6m?= In-Reply-To: <20220113114500.2039439-6-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 5/6] drm/i915: Remove support for unlocked i915_vma unbind X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On 1/13/22 12:44, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Now that we require the object lock for all ops, some code handling > race conditions can be removed. > > This is required to not take short-term pins inside execbuf. > > Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst > Acked-by: Niranjana Vishwanathapura Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström