From: "Hogander, Jouni" <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
To: "intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Grzelak, Michal" <michal.grzelak@intel.com>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/1] drm/i915/display: Add no_psr_reason to PSR debugfs
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 11:46:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3fb1e64044e7b16a5a0e706f08fc85a70ae4278e.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250828104951.1279862-2-michal.grzelak@intel.com>
On Thu, 2025-08-28 at 12:49 +0200, Michał Grzelak wrote:
> There is no reason in debugfs why PSR has been disabled. Add
> no_psr_reason field into struct intel_psr. Write the reason,
> e.g. PSR setup timing not met, into proper PSR debugfs file.
> Extend format of debugfs file to have reason when non-NULL.
> Ensure no_psr_reason is up-to-date or NULL by resetting it
> at the beginning of intel_psr_compute_config. Clean it when
> PSR is activated.
>
> Refactor intel_psr_post_plane_update to use no_psr_reason
> along keep_disabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michał Grzelak <michal.grzelak@intel.com>
> ---
> .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h | 2 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 21 +++++++++++++++--
> --
> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> index fd9d2527889b..0f8332ce1aa0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> @@ -1687,6 +1687,8 @@ struct intel_psr {
> bool pkg_c_latency_used;
>
> u8 active_non_psr_pipes;
> +
> + const char *no_psr_reason;
> };
>
> struct intel_dp {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> index 22433fe2ee14..7c7de30f13f2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> @@ -1579,6 +1579,7 @@ static bool _psr_compute_config(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp,
> if (entry_setup_frames >= 0) {
> intel_dp->psr.entry_setup_frames =
> entry_setup_frames;
> } else {
> + intel_dp->psr.no_psr_reason = "PSR setup timing not
> met";
One more thing I just realized. We cannot set intel_dp-
>psr.no_psr_reason directly in _psr_compute_config. That is because
compute_config may end up not using computed state -> we have intel_dp-
>psr.no_psr_reason out of sync.
It seems we need to have it in intel_crtc_state as well. Then in
intel_psr_pre_plane_update:
intel_dp->psr.no_psr_reason = crtc_state->no_psr_reason
BR,
Jouni Högander
> drm_dbg_kms(display->drm,
> "PSR condition failed: PSR setup timing
> not met\n");
> return false;
> @@ -1663,6 +1664,8 @@ void intel_psr_compute_config(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp,
> struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> u8 active_pipes = 0;
>
> + intel_dp->psr.no_psr_reason = NULL;
> +
> if (!psr_global_enabled(intel_dp)) {
> drm_dbg_kms(display->drm, "PSR disabled by flag\n");
> return;
> @@ -1810,6 +1813,7 @@ static void intel_psr_activate(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp)
> hsw_activate_psr1(intel_dp);
>
> intel_dp->psr.active = true;
> + intel_dp->psr.no_psr_reason = NULL;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -2970,12 +2974,19 @@ void intel_psr_post_plane_update(struct
> intel_atomic_state *state,
> drm_WARN_ON(display->drm,
> psr->enabled && !crtc_state-
> >active_planes);
>
> - keep_disabled |= psr->sink_not_reliable;
> - keep_disabled |= !crtc_state->active_planes;
> + if (psr->sink_not_reliable)
> + keep_disabled = true;
> +
> + if (!crtc_state->active_planes) {
> + psr->no_psr_reason = "All planes inactive";
> + keep_disabled = true;
> + }
>
> /* Display WA #1136: skl, bxt */
> - keep_disabled |= DISPLAY_VER(display) < 11 &&
> - crtc_state->wm_level_disabled;
> + if (DISPLAY_VER(display) < 11 && crtc_state-
> >wm_level_disabled) {
> + psr->no_psr_reason = "Workaround #1136 for
> skl, bxt";
> + keep_disabled = true;
> + }
>
> if (!psr->enabled && !keep_disabled)
> intel_psr_enable_locked(intel_dp,
> crtc_state);
> @@ -3978,6 +3989,8 @@ static void intel_psr_print_mode(struct
> intel_dp *intel_dp,
> region_et = "";
>
> seq_printf(m, "PSR mode: %s%s%s\n", mode, status,
> region_et);
> + if (psr->no_psr_reason)
> + seq_printf(m, " %s\n", psr->no_psr_reason);
> }
>
> static int intel_psr_status(struct seq_file *m, struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-28 11:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-28 10:49 [PATCH v8 0/1] drm/i915/display: Add no_psr_reason to PSR debugfs Michał Grzelak
2025-08-28 10:49 ` [PATCH v8 1/1] " Michał Grzelak
2025-08-28 11:46 ` Hogander, Jouni [this message]
2025-08-28 14:12 ` Sebastian Brzezinka
2025-08-29 16:57 ` Grzelak, Michal
2025-08-28 16:47 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2025-08-28 22:31 ` ✓ i915.CI.Full: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3fb1e64044e7b16a5a0e706f08fc85a70ae4278e.camel@intel.com \
--to=jouni.hogander@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=michal.grzelak@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).