From: "Iddamsetty, Aravind" <aravind.iddamsetty@intel.com>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
<Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915: Add stable memory region names
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 20:59:00 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4530159c-d3c6-533f-9e4b-f50dba6ffea2@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230922134700.235039-6-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
On 22-09-2023 19:16, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>
> At the moment memory region names are a bit too varied and too
> inconsistent to be used for ABI purposes, like for upcoming fdinfo
> memory stats.
>
> System memory can be either system or system-ttm. Local memory has the
> instance number appended, others do not. Not only incosistent but thi
> kind of implementation detail is uninteresting for intended users of
> fdinfo memory stats.
>
> Add a stable name always formed as $type$instance. Could have chosen a
> different stable scheme, but I think any consistent and stable scheme
> should do just fine.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_memory_region.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_memory_region.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_memory_region.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_memory_region.c
> index 3d1fdea9811d..60a03340bbd4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_memory_region.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_memory_region.c
> @@ -216,6 +216,22 @@ static int intel_memory_region_memtest(struct intel_memory_region *mem,
> return err;
> }
>
> +static const char *region_type_str(u16 type)
> +{
> + switch (type) {
> + case INTEL_MEMORY_SYSTEM:
> + return "system";
> + case INTEL_MEMORY_LOCAL:
> + return "local";
> + case INTEL_MEMORY_STOLEN_LOCAL:
> + return "stolen-local";
> + case INTEL_MEMORY_STOLEN_SYSTEM:
> + return "stolen-system";
> + default:
> + return "unknown";
> + }
> +}
> +
> struct intel_memory_region *
> intel_memory_region_create(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> resource_size_t start,
> @@ -244,6 +260,9 @@ intel_memory_region_create(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> mem->type = type;
> mem->instance = instance;
>
> + snprintf(mem->uabi_name, sizeof(mem->uabi_name), "%s%u",
> + region_type_str(type), instance);
> +
> mutex_init(&mem->objects.lock);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mem->objects.list);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_memory_region.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_memory_region.h
> index 2953ed5c3248..9ba36454e51b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_memory_region.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_memory_region.h
> @@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ struct intel_memory_region {
> u16 instance;
> enum intel_region_id id;
> char name[16];
> + char uabi_name[16];
Just a thought instead of creating a new field, can't we derive this
with name and instance?
Thanks,
Aravind.
> bool private; /* not for userspace */
>
> struct {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-26 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-22 13:46 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 0/6] fdinfo memory stats Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-22 13:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Add ability for tracking buffer objects per client Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-22 13:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915: Record which client owns a VM Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-22 13:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Track page table backing store usage Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-22 13:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915: Account ring buffer and context state storage Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-22 13:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915: Add stable memory region names Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-26 15:29 ` Iddamsetty, Aravind [this message]
2023-09-26 15:42 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-27 4:43 ` Iddamsetty, Aravind
2023-09-22 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: Implement fdinfo memory stats printing Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-27 4:58 ` Iddamsetty, Aravind
2023-09-27 6:54 ` Andi Shyti
2023-09-27 13:23 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-27 13:24 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-27 8:07 ` kernel test robot
2023-09-23 2:07 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for fdinfo memory stats (rev8) Patchwork
2023-09-23 2:21 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-09-24 6:52 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4530159c-d3c6-533f-9e4b-f50dba6ffea2@intel.com \
--to=aravind.iddamsetty@intel.com \
--cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).