From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fu Michael Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4 rev2] Sandybridge suspend/resume fixes Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 14:22:39 +0800 Message-ID: <4D8991AF.4050509@linux.intel.com> References: <1300846869-28245-1-git-send-email-zhenyuw@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [143.182.124.21]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0DA89E73D for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 23:22:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1300846869-28245-1-git-send-email-zhenyuw@linux.intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On 2011/3/23 10:21, Zhenyu Wang wrote: > I've done more testing with below patches, eliminated some in first > patch set that doesn't affect suspend issue it seems. > > The test was done with one rev9 SNB on two boards DH67GD and DQ67SW > with latest bios. And it both passed over 100 cycles of S3 testing. > Without these, upstream kernel still hang quickly on them. > better to raise the bar to 1000... > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx >