From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eugeni Dodonov Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] kill /dev/agpgart, v2 Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 19:53:33 -0300 Message-ID: <4FE79A6D.2060105@linux.intel.com> References: <1340563898-3687-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Reply-To: eugeni.dodonov@intel.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDE8E9E908 for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 15:51:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1340563898-3687-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Daniel Vetter Cc: Intel Graphics Development List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On 06/24/2012 03:51 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi all, > > Well, only for gen6+, and now with Dave's suggestion implemented to tell drm > core that we don't need agp. It's ugly and I really prefer if we'd kill the drm > agp midlayer stuff instead. But this way we can go forward with moving gen6+ gtt > stuff to drm/i915 and implementing some neat new cool things. > > As usual, flames&bikesheds highly welcome. I cannot think on a less invasive way to do so, so, for the series: Reviewed-by: Eugeni Dodonov With just one tiny bikeshed on patch2. Eugeni