From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Hounschell Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] Intel graphics drm issue? Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 12:09:01 -0400 Message-ID: <507AE39D.5020708@cfl.rr.com> References: <507812E8.3060607@compro.net> <20121012231459.166e29fd@neptune.home> <5079B97C.7020401@cfl.rr.com> <5079BE5C.8020401@cfl.rr.com> <507A91EA.2030205@cfl.rr.com> <507AC9DC.4030701@cfl.rr.com> <507ADD14.7050503@cfl.rr.com> <20121014175538.3bdd7cb8@neptune.home> Reply-To: dmarkh@cfl.rr.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20121014175538.3bdd7cb8@neptune.home> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bruno_Pr=E9mont?= Cc: Daniel Vetter , markh@compro.net, Intel Graphics Development , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On 10/14/2012 11:55 AM, Bruno Pr=E9mont wrote: > On Sun, 14 October 2012 Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Mark Hounschell = wrote: >>> There is something amiss. Here is my i915_pci_probe routine. I Add= ed a >>> couple more printks. NONE of these show up in dmesg. Not even the "= Entered" >>> printk. ???? >> >> That's rather strange indeed. Is there another driver bound by >> accident to the intel graphics? You can check that with lspci -k >> -Daniel > > A few mails ago in a kernel cmd I saw a nomodeset, could it be that > it's still around? Yes, that is still around. I'll get rid of it and try again. Mark