From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94482C2D0DA for ; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 18:09:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A8602080D for ; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 18:09:09 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6A8602080D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCAF589C85; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 18:09:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8412089C85 for ; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 18:09:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Dec 2019 10:09:07 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.69,360,1571727600"; d="scan'208";a="392405698" Received: from aelgham-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.252.49.252]) ([10.252.49.252]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Dec 2019 10:09:05 -0800 To: Matt Roper References: <20191224012026.3157766-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com> <20191226173917.GE2877816@mdroper-desk1.amr.corp.intel.com> From: Lionel Landwerlin Organization: Intel Corporation (UK) Ltd. - Co. Reg. #1134945 - Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ Message-ID: <51aa12c9-ed90-7eb0-3d4b-1380f25fd2bb@intel.com> Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2019 20:09:04 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191226173917.GE2877816@mdroper-desk1.amr.corp.intel.com> Content-Language: en-US Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] Workaround updates X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Lucas De Marchi Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On 26/12/2019 19:39, Matt Roper wrote: > On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 09:31:29PM +0200, Lionel Landwerlin wrote: >> On 24/12/2019 03:20, Matt Roper wrote: >>> A quick drive-by update for some workarounds I noticed that were >>> added/extended to additional platforms. >>> >>> Cc: Lucas De Marchi >>> Cc: Matt Atwood >>> Cc: Radhakrishna Sripada >>> >>> Matt Roper (3): >>> drm/i915: Extend WaDisableDARBFClkGating to icl,ehl,tgl >>> drm/i915: Add Wa_1408615072 and Wa_1407596294 to icl,ehl >>> drm/i915/tgl: Extend Wa_1408615072 to tgl >>> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 7 +++++-- >>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 7 ++++++- >>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 12 ++++++++++++ >>> 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >>> >> Acked-by: Lionel Landwerlin >> >> >> What do you think about Wa_1407352427 for ICL? >> >> Sounds like it could fix some 3D hangs too. > Yeah, looks like we need to add that one for ICL/EHL. I'll send a > separate patch for that one since this series is ready to merge once CI > results come back. Thanks for pointing it out! > > > Matt Thanks for taking that on. One question though about those workarounds, we probably need to have them applied to older kernels with ICL support right? Should they be Cc stable? Cheers, -Lionel > >> >> -Lionel >> _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx