From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Felix Miata Subject: Re: i810 only partially usable Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 11:41:25 -0400 Message-ID: <52406125.9070709@earthlink.net> References: <523F8F45.6080305@earthlink.net> <20130923082201.GA8482@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com> <52404C6E.5000602@earthlink.net> <20130923145134.GJ8482@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.65]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C22C9E641C for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 08:41:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [72.40.99.108] (helo=[192.168.0.11]) by elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1VO8GM-00014g-5t for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 11:41:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20130923145134.GJ8482@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On 2013-09-23 15:51 (GMT+0100) Chris Wilson composed: > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:13:02AM -0400, Felix Miata wrote: >> Did Adam already fix this? Will you be including this among your >> next submits? Do I need to file a bug first? > You have reported the bug, I've sent the patch onwards. It would be most > useful if you could test it, but I'm optimistic that Adam would be able > to review it without. :-) >> ...I just test what >> others package, and get frustrated by comments like this one: >> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66462#c10 > I am suggesting that there is a large known change in behaviour with > recent Xservers which is very likely to impact upon you. I am sorry you > find our requests for feedback frustrating, we too find it frustrating > not to be in a position to test ideas and fixes ourselves, and very much > rely on your good selves to both report issues and help us diagnose them. The frustration is not the comment itself, but the obstacle in needing to build a binary to be able to test the efficacy of the patch. Might having a Gentoo installation facilitate such tests by non-programmers like me who normally use a dpkg or rpm distro and don't how to use developer tools? -- "The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation) Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/