From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: drm/i915/ns2501: Update from git working
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 07:02:45 +0200
Message-ID: <5254E375.3020104@math.tu-berlin.de>
References: <1381227943-4409-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
	<26192_1381227964_5253DDBB_26192_8102_1_1381227943-4409-3-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
	<52547189.7050600@math.tu-berlin.de>
	<26192_1381269615_5254806F_26192_12488_1_20131008220032.GI8303@phenom.ffwll.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from medousa.rus.uni-stuttgart.de (medousa.rus.uni-stuttgart.de
	[129.69.192.4])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4095BE6311
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Tue,  8 Oct 2013 22:03:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <26192_1381269615_5254806F_26192_12488_1_20131008220032.GI8303@phenom.ffwll.local>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>, Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On 09.10.2013 00:00, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> My drm-intel git branch doesn't yet have the two patches that are meant to
> replace your ns2501 hack ... So I'm not too sure what exactly you've
> tested that made things magically better?

Is there a difference between the 3.12rc4 from kernel.org and the 
3.12.rc3+ from your git repository that might explain the difference? 
These are the two kernels I tested, with the results as presented. 
Kernel.org is apparently one release cycle (and one bug) ahead.

Greetings,
	Thomas