From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Richter Subject: Workaround for flicker with panning on the i830 - found a way for tiled displays Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 14:16:11 +0100 Message-ID: <52861E9B.5080509@math.tu-berlin.de> References: <32493_1383928311_527D11F3_32493_10984_1_20131108163213.GC14082@phenom.ffwll.local> <5280F8DF.5020205@math.tu-berlin.de> <1565_1384184620_5280FB2C_1565_9181_1_CAKMK7uF2UmKJHvVPrzE7-7A9DQ5JrLHAFnDiuVUDHFU+DoOXww@mail.gmail.com> <52825A28.3040500@math.tu-berlin.de> <1565_1384276909_528263AC_1565_19510_1_20131112172217.GB3741@phenom.ffwll.local> <5283D81A.1080105@math.tu-berlin.de> <26136_1384374018_5283DF02_26136_9623_1_20131113202049.GH7251@phenom.ffwll.local> <52847857.7070200@math.tu-berlin.de> <26136_1384417275_528487FB_26136_12808_1_CAKMK7uEfiAoFutfk=mtqteuV07t5SneGniyXnRet_T3Bs4spRw@mail.gmail.com> <52851358.6040801@math.tu-berlin.de> <26136_1384453961_52851749_26136_18549_1_20131114183308.GI22741@phenom.ffwll.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from hydra.rus.uni-stuttgart.de (smtp.uni-stuttgart.de [129.69.192.3]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D268DFB788 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 05:16:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <26136_1384453961_52851749_26136_18549_1_20131114183308.GI22741@phenom.ffwll.local> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org To: Daniel Vetter Cc: intel-gfx List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Hi Daniel, hi others, did even more experiments. I guess I understand now better. Indeed, the trouble seems to be the watermark levels. I played more with all that, and the real culprit seems to be the FW_BLC register controlling the watermarks. On the i830 with the current settings, it is defined to be 0x1080304 which sets the watermark a bit too low. If I set it to 0x1080306 instead, I get a stable display in all panning positions (hurray!). I would like to fix this, but I guess I would need to understand the logic a little bit better. At the time being, you probably better put the linear frame buffer workaround on hold, it looks I really got something here. Greetings, Thomas