From: Thomas Richter <richter@rus.uni-stuttgart.de>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Performance drop on XDrawRectangles()
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 16:57:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52CD7580.8040106@rus.uni-stuttgart.de> (raw)
Hi folks,
during the changes from 3.12rc7 to 3.13rc4, the performance of
XDrawRectangles() dropped considerably. Interestingly, it is not the raw
rectangles drawing operations that are slow, but it seems that the
"per-call" overhead has increased by one magnitude. In specific, if you
use the unmodified "x11pref" program:
x11pref -rect10
no substiantial changes are visible. However, if the rectangles are
drawn one by one by changing:
/* snip: old version, lines 86ff of do_rects.c of the x11perf program */
void
DoRectangles(XParms xp, Parms p, int reps)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i != reps; i++) {
XFillRectangles(xp->d, xp->w, pgc, rects, p->objects);
if (pgc == xp->bggc)
pgc = xp->fggc;
else
pgc = xp->bggc;
CheckAbort ();
}
}
/* to the following : */
void
DoRectangles(XParms xp, Parms p, int reps)
{
int i;
int j;
for (i = 0; i != reps; i++) {
for(j = 0;j < p->objects;j++) {
XFillRectangles(xp->d, xp->w, pgc, rects+j, 1);
}
if (pgc == xp->bggc)
pgc = xp->fggc;
else
pgc = xp->bggc;
CheckAbort ();
}
}
by instead drawing the rectangles one by one, the performance is
decreased to one eigths of the original performance:
400000 trep @ 0.0687 msec ( 14600.0/sec): 10x10 rectangle (new)
2500000 trep @ 0.0107 msec ( 93900.0/sec): 10x10 rectangle (old)
Thus, apparently, not the actual hardware acceleration degraded, but
there is something in the call path that slowed down the call considerably.
Any idea what changed?
Greetings,
Thomas
next reply other threads:[~2014-01-08 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-08 15:57 Thomas Richter [this message]
2014-01-08 16:18 ` Performance drop on XDrawRectangles() Daniel Vetter
2014-01-08 17:10 ` Chris Wilson
2014-01-08 17:49 ` Thomas Richter
2014-01-08 18:09 ` Chris Wilson
2014-01-08 22:08 ` Chris Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52CD7580.8040106@rus.uni-stuttgart.de \
--to=richter@rus.uni-stuttgart.de \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox