From: Thomas Richter <richter@rus.uni-stuttgart.de>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: Performance drop on XDrawRectangles()
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 18:49:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52CD8FB4.9030806@rus.uni-stuttgart.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140108171047.GB27406@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
On 01/08/2014 06:10 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 04:57:52PM +0100, Thomas Richter wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> during the changes from 3.12rc7 to 3.13rc4, the performance of
>> XDrawRectangles() dropped considerably. Interestingly, it is not the
>> raw rectangles drawing operations that are slow, but it seems that
>> the "per-call" overhead has increased by one magnitude. In specific,
>> if you use the unmodified "x11pref" program:
>>
>
> Just to be clear: new = 3.13-rc4, old = 3.12-rc7 ?
Yes, exactly.
> I've taken a quick look at this on an ivb i7-3270qm, and see a 296kops/s
> to 248kops/s decrease. Not massive, and considering the difference in
> our hardware probably a distinct issue.
Well, note that a 1Ghz P-III / i830M is not an i7-3270qm. (-;
Did you made the changes in x11perf as I did? The bottleneck is not in
the actual rectangle rendering, it is somewhere in the call-path from
the application down to the hardware, i.e. the per-call overhead
increased by a factor of eight.
Kernel configuration is identical, as much as I could arrange it. X11
and higher level libraries are all identical, I only changed the kernel.
Greetings,
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-08 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-08 15:57 Performance drop on XDrawRectangles() Thomas Richter
2014-01-08 16:18 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-01-08 17:10 ` Chris Wilson
2014-01-08 17:49 ` Thomas Richter [this message]
2014-01-08 18:09 ` Chris Wilson
2014-01-08 22:08 ` Chris Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52CD8FB4.9030806@rus.uni-stuttgart.de \
--to=richter@rus.uni-stuttgart.de \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox