From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] drm/i915: Simplify page allocation loop a bit
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 17:33:04 +0000
Message-ID: <53330F50.7030304@linux.intel.com>
References: <1395852527-6048-1-git-send-email-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
 <20140326171149.GC29626@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88])
 by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C39576E3BF
 for <Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 10:45:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20140326171149.GC29626@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
 <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
 <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org
Sender: "Intel-gfx" <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org


On 03/26/2014 05:11 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 04:48:47PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>>
>> Looks like there are some redundant lines in the main loop of
>> i915_gem_object_get_pages_gtt.
>>
>> I haven't tested this so just RFC please.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
>
> I am pretty sure we can't drop CONFIG_SWIOTLB as swiotlb_nr_tbl only
> exists when lib/swiotlb.c is built i.e. #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SWIOTLB).

I think you're right. I'll repost. Although it diminishes the 
attractiveness of the whole line reducing enterprise a bit.

Thanks,

Tvrtko