intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Philipp Stanner <phasta@mailbox.org>
To: "Philipp Stanner" <phasta@kernel.org>,
	"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	"Gustavo Padovan" <gustavo@padovan.org>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"Felix Kuehling" <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>,
	"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
	"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
	"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	"Joonas Lahtinen" <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	"Tvrtko Ursulin" <tursulin@ursulin.net>,
	"Huang Rui" <ray.huang@amd.com>,
	"Matthew Auld" <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
	"Matthew Brost" <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
	"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	"Lucas De Marchi" <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
	"Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	 intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] dma-fence: Remove return code of dma_fence_signal() et al.
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2025 15:10:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53354e12b55d7c558b4418d876598641d862737f.camel@mailbox.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251201105011.19386-2-phasta@kernel.org>

On Mon, 2025-12-01 at 11:50 +0100, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> Tested this with dma_buf selftests and drm_sched tests.
> 
> Changes in v2:
>   - Fix bug and don't turn the kernel into a smoking pile of ashes by
>     not setting the signaled-bit…
>   - Add functions (dma_fence_check_and_signal()) preserving the old
>     behavior of dma_fence_signal() & Co. (Felix)
>   - Use those new functions in amdkfd, xe, ttm and st-dma-fence.
>   - Be a bit less aggressive and keep the git-diff smaller.
>   - Add a patch using the flag-helper in Xe. (Matthew)
> 
> Barely anyone uses dma_fence_signal()'s (and similar functions') return
> code. Checking it is pretty much useless anyways, because what are you
> going to do if a fence was already signal it? Unsignal it and signal it
> again? ;p
> 
> Removing the return code simplifies the API and makes it easier for me
> to sit on top with Rust DmaFence.
> 
> Philipp Stanner (8):
>   dma-buf/dma-fence: Add dma_fence_test_signaled_flag()
>   dma-buf/dma-fence: Add dma_fence_check_and_signal()
>   amd/amdkfd: Use dma_fence_check_and_signal()
>   drm/xe: Use dma_fence_check_and_signal_locked()
>   dma-buf: Don't misuse dma_fence_signal()
>   drm/ttm: Use dma_fence_check_and_signal()
>   dma-buf/dma-fence: Remove return code of signaling-functions

Applied those 7 patches to drm-misc-next. Had to do a tiny rebase
because 033559473dd3b55558b535aa37b8848c207b5cbb is not yet in drm-
misc-next (dma-fence series was based on master at first, which
contains that commit).

>   drm/xe: Use dma_fence_test_signaled_flag()

Left for Matthow to pick up whenever he wishes.


P.

> 
>  drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c                   | 100 +++++++++++-------
>  drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence.c                |   4 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c      |   6 +-
>  .../gpu/drm/ttm/tests/ttm_bo_validate_test.c  |   2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c            |   9 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_fence.c              |   4 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c                    |   3 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sched_job.c             |   2 +-
>  include/linux/dma-fence.h                     |  35 ++++--
>  9 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-12-04 20:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-01 10:50 [PATCH 0/6] dma-fence: Remove return code of dma_fence_signal() et al Philipp Stanner
2025-12-01 10:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] dma-buf/dma-fence: Add dma_fence_test_signaled_flag() Philipp Stanner
2025-12-03 13:03   ` Christian König
2025-12-01 10:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] dma-buf/dma-fence: Add dma_fence_check_and_signal() Philipp Stanner
2025-12-01 13:23   ` Christian König
2025-12-01 13:55     ` Philipp Stanner
2025-12-01 15:20       ` Christian König
2025-12-01 15:34         ` Philipp Stanner
2025-12-01 16:06           ` Christian König
2025-12-01 15:53         ` Philipp Stanner
2025-12-01 16:08           ` Christian König
2025-12-02  9:19             ` Philipp Stanner
2025-12-03 13:05   ` Christian König
2025-12-01 10:50 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] amd/amdkfd: Use dma_fence_check_and_signal() Philipp Stanner
2025-12-01 15:21   ` Felix Kuehling
2025-12-03 13:10   ` Christian König
2025-12-01 10:50 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] drm/xe: Use dma_fence_check_and_signal_locked() Philipp Stanner
2025-12-01 19:38   ` Matthew Brost
2025-12-02  7:17     ` Philipp Stanner
2025-12-02 15:57       ` Matthew Brost
2025-12-02 20:47     ` Andi Shyti
2025-12-02 21:04       ` Matthew Brost
2025-12-03 21:13         ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-12-03 13:14   ` Christian König
2025-12-01 10:50 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] dma-buf: Don't misuse dma_fence_signal() Philipp Stanner
2025-12-03 13:11   ` Christian König
2025-12-01 10:50 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] drm/ttm: Use dma_fence_check_and_signal() Philipp Stanner
2025-12-03 13:11   ` Christian König
2025-12-01 10:50 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] dma-buf/dma-fence: Remove return code of signaling-functions Philipp Stanner
2025-12-03 13:13   ` Christian König
2025-12-01 10:50 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] drm/xe: Use dma_fence_test_signaled_flag() Philipp Stanner
2025-12-01 19:33   ` Matthew Brost
2025-12-02  8:29     ` Philipp Stanner
2025-12-03 13:15   ` Christian König
2025-12-03 15:18     ` Philipp Stanner
2025-12-03 15:24       ` Christian König
2025-12-03 17:31         ` Matthew Brost
2025-12-03 21:12           ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-12-04 14:10 ` Philipp Stanner [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-11-26 13:19 [PATCH 0/6] dma-fence: Remove return code of dma_fence_signal() et al Philipp Stanner
2025-11-26 14:02 ` Christian König
2025-11-26 14:09   ` Philipp Stanner
2025-11-26 17:26     ` Matthew Brost

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53354e12b55d7c558b4418d876598641d862737f.camel@mailbox.org \
    --to=phasta@mailbox.org \
    --cc=Felix.Kuehling@amd.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=gustavo@padovan.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=phasta@kernel.org \
    --cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tursulin@ursulin.net \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).