From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "S, Deepak" Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/71] drm/i915/chv: Add Cherryview support Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 09:31:39 +0530 Message-ID: <534617A3.2000401@intel.com> References: <1397039349-10639-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> <20140409132516.GN18465@intel.com> <20140409150527.GQ18465@intel.com> <20140409165338.GC9262@phenom.ffwll.local> <53459BAA.2050608@intel.com> <20140409200043.GE9262@phenom.ffwll.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB1F16E174 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 21:02:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140409200043.GE9262@phenom.ffwll.local> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" To: Daniel Vetter Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On 4/10/2014 1:30 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:42:42AM +0530, S, Deepak wrote: >> >> >> On 4/9/2014 10:23 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 06:05:27PM +0300, Ville Syrj=E4l=E4 wrote: >>>> On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 02:30:52PM +0000, S, Deepak wrote: >>>>> Hi Ville, >>>>> >>>>> I am Ok with cleaning up and pushing the Code. Can you please tell me >>>>> when we need to start pushing the code and branch to use >>>>> (drm-intel-next)? >>>> >>>> Well you can consider it pushed now that it's in the open. The patches >>>> just need a bit of extra polish I think. Well, unless you're planning >>>> a full blown rewrite of the code ;) >>>> >>>> I guess you need to take into consideration whatever bdw rc6/rps patch= es >>>> are still in flight, but since you've been doing some review there I >>>> think you have a better idea than I do how things are progressing. >>>> >>>> I always work on top of nightly, so I guess that's a good choice :) >>> >>> Yes, -nightly is always the recommended branch to base upstream patches >>> on. I'll sort out the conflict mess (or well, try to) if it doesn't app= ly >>> to plain dinq or some other branch. drm-intel-next tends to be too >>> outdated ;-) >>> -Daniel >> >> Hi Daniel/Ville. >> >> Some of the patches are lined up for squashing right? So you want me >> to work on this patches to align to upstream code and resubmit it to >> same email thread? > > Hm, I expect this chv thread to become a bit mess really quickly tbh ;-) > And since we don't have chv merged yet there's not really a baseline to do > this on top. > > I guess the simplest approach would be for you to grab ville's chv tree, > squash in the patches as discussed and then just starting on polishing > your chv patches. Then as I pull in patches from this series you can drop > them from yours. A bit messy, but I don't see any other approach really. > > Note that a pile of people are signed up to review this, so maybe hold off > a bit until the review for your patches have been done. > -Daniel Thanks Daniel. Ville can you please share your chv tree details?