Re: [PATCH 30/71] drm/i915/chv: Enable PM interrupts when we in CHV turbo initialize sequence.

[Deepak S <deepak.s@linux.intel.com>]

On Thursday 10 April 2014 04:03 AM, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:47:01AM +0530, Deepak S wrote:
>> On Wednesday 09 April 2014 06:36 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 01:28:28PM +0300, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wrote:
>>>> +static void gen8_enable_rps_interrupts(struct drm_device *dev)
>>>> +{
>>>> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>>>> +
>>>> +	/* Clear out any stale interrupts first */
>>>> +	spin_lock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
>>>> +	WARN_ON(dev_priv->rps.pm_iir);
>>>> +	I915_WRITE(GEN8_GT_IIR(2), I915_READ(GEN8_GT_IIR(2)));
>>>> +	dev_priv->pm_irq_mask &= ~GEN6_PM_RPS_EVENTS;
>>>> +	I915_WRITE(GEN8_GT_IMR(2), dev_priv->pm_irq_mask);
>>>> +	spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
>>>> +
>>>> +	I915_WRITE(GEN8_GT_IER(2), GEN6_PM_RPS_EVENTS);
>>>> +	/* only unmask PM interrupts we need. Mask all others. */
>>>> +	I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMINTRMSK, ~GEN6_PM_RPS_EVENTS);
>>> PMINTRMSK handling is now a part of set_rps (and so this line is
>>> redundant).
>>> -Chris
>> Thanks Chris. I will make the changes based on the current nightly code
>>
>>
> I think my patch kept up with this, but I too am not sure. In either
> case feel free to reuse, copy, or review that one.
>
> I don't think I've mailed out the very latest version, but I am pretty
> sure I mailed out after the last painful rebase (and it's tested on
> BDW).
>
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~bwidawsk/drm-intel/commit/?h=bdw-rc6&id=80fbe001fc4ba38c41db3cec177c9157b2613c3c
>
Thanks Ben. I will reuse the patches submitted by you