From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Knut Petersen Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Use the first mode if there is no preferred mode in the EDID Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 19:20:26 +0200 Message-ID: <537A3D5A.1020702@t-online.de> References: <1399993657-4544-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> <20140513155012.GR7239@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com> <20140513132404.5745456f@jbarnes-desktop> <5373009B.50800@t-online.de> <87k39npiia.fsf@intel.com> <20140515081907.GA3437@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailout09.t-online.de (mailout09.t-online.de [194.25.134.84]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E67546E65D for ; Mon, 19 May 2014 10:20:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140515081907.GA3437@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" To: Chris Wilson , Jani Nikula , Jesse Barnes , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On 15.05.2014 10:19, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:13:01AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Wed, 14 May 2014, Knut Petersen wrote: >>> On 13.05.2014 22:24, Jesse Barnes wrote: >>>> On Tue, 13 May 2014 16:50:12 +0100 >>>> Chris Wilson wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 04:07:37PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: >>>>>> This matches the algorithm used by earlier kernels when selecting the >>>>>> mode for the fbcon. And only if there is no modes at all, do we fall >>>>>> back to using the BIOS configuration. Seamless transition is still >>>>>> preserved (from the BIOS configuration to ours) so long as the BIOS has >>>>>> also chosen what we hope is the native configuration. >>>>>> >>>>>> Reported-by: Knut Petersen >>>>>> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78655 >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson >>>>>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org >>> I don't think that Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org is necessary, kernels up >>> to 3.14.x don't expose the problem. And as this fixes a post-3.14 >>> regression this is a clear candidate for 3.15 >> Chris, do we drop cc: stable? > The switch-over was in 3.15, then yes the regression is only limited to > 3.15 > -Chris > Still missing in git master ... cu, Knut