From: "Kumar, Shobhit" <shobhit.kumar@intel.com>
To: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: dsi: fix pipe-off timeout due to port vs. pipe disable ordering
Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 21:57:19 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5384BCE7.5060005@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1401206409-24937-1-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com>
On 5/27/2014 9:30 PM, Imre Deak wrote:
> If we disable first the port (by disabling DPI) and only then the
> display pipe the pipe-off flag will never be set, possibly leading to a
> hanged pipe state at the next modeset-enable.
>
> Note that according to the VLV2 display cluster HAS, we should disable
> the port before the pipe. This doesn't seem to match reality based on
> the above and it's also asymmetric with the enabling sequence, where we
> first enable the port and then the pipe.
>
> v2:
> - send the panel shutdown command before stopping the pipe, since this
> is the recommended sequence (Shobhit)
>
> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@intel.com>
Regards
Shobhit
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> index 3ea3839..b397465 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> @@ -207,14 +207,9 @@ static void intel_dsi_enable_nop(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> */
> }
>
> -static void intel_dsi_disable(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> +static void intel_dsi_pre_disable(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> {
> - struct drm_device *dev = encoder->base.dev;
> - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> - struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(encoder->base.crtc);
> struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi = enc_to_intel_dsi(&encoder->base);
> - int pipe = intel_crtc->pipe;
> - u32 temp;
>
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\n");
>
> @@ -222,7 +217,21 @@ static void intel_dsi_disable(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> /* Send Shutdown command to the panel in LP mode */
> dpi_send_cmd(intel_dsi, SHUTDOWN, DPI_LP_MODE_EN);
> msleep(10);
> + }
> +}
>
> +static void intel_dsi_disable(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> +{
> + struct drm_device *dev = encoder->base.dev;
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> + struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(encoder->base.crtc);
> + struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi = enc_to_intel_dsi(&encoder->base);
> + int pipe = intel_crtc->pipe;
> + u32 temp;
> +
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\n");
> +
> + if (is_vid_mode(intel_dsi)) {
> /* de-assert ip_tg_enable signal */
> temp = I915_READ(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(pipe));
> I915_WRITE(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(pipe), temp & ~DPI_ENABLE);
> @@ -294,6 +303,8 @@ static void intel_dsi_post_disable(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
>
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\n");
>
> + intel_dsi_disable(encoder);
> +
> intel_dsi_clear_device_ready(encoder);
>
> val = I915_READ(DSPCLK_GATE_D);
> @@ -692,7 +703,7 @@ bool intel_dsi_init(struct drm_device *dev)
> intel_encoder->pre_pll_enable = intel_dsi_pre_pll_enable;
> intel_encoder->pre_enable = intel_dsi_pre_enable;
> intel_encoder->enable = intel_dsi_enable_nop;
> - intel_encoder->disable = intel_dsi_disable;
> + intel_encoder->disable = intel_dsi_pre_disable;
> intel_encoder->post_disable = intel_dsi_post_disable;
> intel_encoder->get_hw_state = intel_dsi_get_hw_state;
> intel_encoder->get_config = intel_dsi_get_config;
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-27 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-27 13:15 [PATCH] drm/i915: dsi: fix pipe-off timeout due to port vs. pipe disable ordering Imre Deak
2014-05-27 14:15 ` Kumar, Shobhit
2014-05-27 15:12 ` Imre Deak
2014-05-27 15:34 ` Kumar, Shobhit
2014-05-27 15:53 ` Imre Deak
2014-05-27 16:00 ` Imre Deak
2014-05-27 16:27 ` Kumar, Shobhit [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5384BCE7.5060005@intel.com \
--to=shobhit.kumar@intel.com \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox