From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Sun, Daisy" <daisy.sun@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/bdw: Broaden FBC resolution limit
 to 4096x4096
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 15:55:16 -0700
Message-ID: <539F75D4.7030105@intel.com>
References: <1402937532-24673-1-git-send-email-damien.lespiau@intel.com>	<20140616171145.GO32694@strange.amr.corp.intel.com>	<20140616181549.GJ5821@phenom.ffwll.local>	<539F5680.2000001@intel.com>
 <CAKMK7uGyMKMG-=KiaWWV08W0fzZXwVZsKfzioYOX3QiajWhajA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115])
 by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1575B6E3E7
 for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 15:55:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAKMK7uGyMKMG-=KiaWWV08W0fzZXwVZsKfzioYOX3QiajWhajA@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
 <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
 <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org
Sender: "Intel-gfx" <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

IC. I started working from BDW FBC, did not check all the gens 
thoroughly:-)
Sent out a version 2 just now.
- Daisy

On 6/16/2014 2:49 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:41 PM, Sun, Daisy <daisy.sun@intel.com> wrote:
>> Yes, the change starts from HSW. I'll update the patch.
>> what's the "rant" I need to insert? I was not in the list a year ago:),
>> having some trouble find the email as reference.
>> Any archives I can look into?
> No rant to insert for you ;-) That was a placeholder in my mail,
> instead of boring people with all the details. Iirc that was to the
> internal mailing list, and could be older than a year even.
>
> Essentially there's a bunch of constraints about pixel depth and pfit
> usage on recent platforms that we don't quite check correctly. Your
> patch update to check for gen >= 8 || IS_HASWELL is perfectly fine
> as-is.
> -Daniel