From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] igt/gem_userptr_blits: Shared memory allocations
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 11:30:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53BFBCDE.6070009@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1405071640-29692-2-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
On 07/11/2014 10:40 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> The forked tests allocate the bo (and thus for userptr, the memory) in
> the parent and pass them to all children. The difference for userptr is
> that we allocate system memory which the kernel then copies into each
> child. As the children need to access the memory for their checks, it
> does need to be shared - so allocate the userptr from shared memory!
>
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80208
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
> tests/gem_userptr_blits.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/gem_userptr_blits.c b/tests/gem_userptr_blits.c
> index 14efdda..9cf681b 100644
> --- a/tests/gem_userptr_blits.c
> +++ b/tests/gem_userptr_blits.c
> @@ -321,17 +321,32 @@ create_userptr(int fd, uint32_t val, uint32_t *ptr)
> }
>
> static void **handle_ptr_map;
> -static unsigned int num_handle_ptr_map;
> +static int *handle_size_map;
> +static unsigned int num_handle_map;
>
> -static void add_handle_ptr(uint32_t handle, void *ptr)
> +static void reset_handle_ptr(void)
> {
> - if (handle >= num_handle_ptr_map) {
> + free(handle_ptr_map);
> + free(handle_size_map);
> + num_handle_map = 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void add_handle_ptr(uint32_t handle, void *ptr, int size)
> +{
> + if (handle >= num_handle_map) {
> handle_ptr_map = realloc(handle_ptr_map,
> (handle + 1000) * sizeof(void*));
> - num_handle_ptr_map = handle + 1000;
> + igt_assert(handle_ptr_map);
> +
> + handle_size_map = realloc(handle_size_map,
> + (handle + 1000) * sizeof(int));
> + igt_assert(handle_size_map);
> +
> + num_handle_map = handle + 1000;
> }
>
> handle_ptr_map[handle] = ptr;
> + handle_size_map[handle] = size;
> }
>
> static void *get_handle_ptr(uint32_t handle)
> @@ -341,10 +356,10 @@ static void *get_handle_ptr(uint32_t handle)
>
> static void free_handle_ptr(uint32_t handle)
> {
> - igt_assert(handle < num_handle_ptr_map);
> + igt_assert(handle < num_handle_map);
> igt_assert(handle_ptr_map[handle]);
>
> - free(handle_ptr_map[handle]);
> + munmap(handle_ptr_map[handle], handle_size_map[handle]);
> handle_ptr_map[handle] = NULL;
> }
>
> @@ -354,12 +369,15 @@ static uint32_t create_userptr_bo(int fd, int size)
> uint32_t handle;
> int ret;
>
> - ret = posix_memalign(&ptr, PAGE_SIZE, size);
> - igt_assert(ret == 0);
> + ptr = mmap(NULL, size,
> + PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
> + MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_SHARED,
> + -1, 0);
> + igt_assert(ptr != MAP_FAILED);
I wasn't sure about this straight away, but man page says "...on Linux,
the mapping will be created at a nearby page boundary..." so it's fine.
> ret = gem_userptr(fd, (uint32_t *)ptr, size, 0, &handle);
> igt_assert(ret == 0);
> - add_handle_ptr(handle, ptr);
> + add_handle_ptr(handle, ptr, size);
>
> return handle;
> }
> @@ -641,6 +659,7 @@ static void sigbus(int sig, siginfo_t *info, void *param)
> MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_FIXED, -1, 0);
> if ((unsigned long)addr == ptr) {
> memset(addr, counter, sizeof(linear));
> + munmap(addr, sizeof(linear));
> return;
> }
> }
> @@ -708,6 +727,8 @@ static int test_dmabuf(void)
> close(fd1);
> close(fd2);
>
> + reset_handle_ptr();
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-11 10:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-11 9:40 [PATCH 1/3] Wait for any pid in order to reap failure quicker Chris Wilson
2014-07-11 9:40 ` [PATCH 2/3] igt/gem_userptr_blits: Shared memory allocations Chris Wilson
2014-07-11 10:30 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2014-07-11 9:40 ` [PATCH 3/3] igt/gem_userptr_blits: Verify that userptr bo work on unshared memory Chris Wilson
2014-07-11 10:45 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2014-07-11 11:56 ` [PATCH 1/3] Wait for any pid in order to reap failure quicker Tvrtko Ursulin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53BFBCDE.6070009@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox