From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Deepak S Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/chv: Drop WaGsvBringDownFreqInRc6 Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 08:51:20 +0530 Message-ID: <53C5EFB0.1070805@linux.intel.com> References: <1403934986-3820-1-git-send-email-deepak.s@linux.intel.com> <53C4D963.8060101@linux.intel.com> <20140714081715.532fbe97@jbarnes-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB01D6E4CF for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 20:26:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140714081715.532fbe97@jbarnes-desktop> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" To: Jesse Barnes Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Monday 14 July 2014 08:47 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 13:03:55 +0530 > Deepak S wrote: > >> On Saturday 28 June 2014 11:26 AM, deepak.s@linux.intel.com wrote: >>> From: Deepak S >>> >>> Drop WaGsvBringDownFreq on CHV. >>> When in RC6 requesting the min freq should be fine to bring the >>> voltage down. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Deepak S >>> --- >>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 4 +++- >>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c >>> index 6b6cfd4..4875f745 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c >>> @@ -3253,7 +3253,9 @@ void gen6_rps_idle(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) >>> >>> mutex_lock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock); >>> if (dev_priv->rps.enabled) { >>> - if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev)) >>> + if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev)) >>> + valleyview_set_rps(dev_priv->dev, dev_priv->rps.min_freq_softlimit); >>> + else if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev)) >>> vlv_set_rps_idle(dev_priv); >>> else >>> gen6_set_rps(dev_priv->dev, dev_priv->rps.min_freq_softlimit); >> Hi Jesse, >> >> can you please review this patch? > Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes > Thanks for reviewing