From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Deepak S Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/chv: Use timeout mode for RC6 on chv Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 13:50:20 +0530 Message-ID: <53CE1EC4.1030600@linux.intel.com> References: <1405568787-20420-1-git-send-email-deepak.s@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AA216E05C for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 01:25:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1405568787-20420-1-git-send-email-deepak.s@linux.intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" To: intel-gfx , ben@bwidawsk.net List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Thursday 17 July 2014 09:16 AM, deepak.s@linux.intel.com wrote: > From: Deepak S > > Higher RC6 residency is observed using timeout mode > instead of EI mode. It's Recommended to use TO Method for RC6. > > Signed-off-by: Deepak S > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > index 19c5c26..88bad36 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > @@ -4037,7 +4037,7 @@ static void cherryview_enable_rps(struct drm_device *dev) > I915_WRITE(RING_MAX_IDLE(ring->mmio_base), 10); > I915_WRITE(GEN6_RC_SLEEP, 0); > > - I915_WRITE(GEN6_RC6_THRESHOLD, 50000); /* 50/125ms per EI */ > + I915_WRITE(GEN6_RC6_THRESHOLD, 0x557); > > /* allows RC6 residency counter to work */ > I915_WRITE(VLV_COUNTER_CONTROL, > @@ -4053,7 +4053,7 @@ static void cherryview_enable_rps(struct drm_device *dev) > /* 3: Enable RC6 */ > if ((intel_enable_rc6(dev) & INTEL_RC6_ENABLE) && > (pcbr >> VLV_PCBR_ADDR_SHIFT)) > - rc6_mode = GEN6_RC_CTL_EI_MODE(1); > + rc6_mode = GEN7_RC_CTL_TO_MODE; > > I915_WRITE(GEN6_RC_CONTROL, rc6_mode); > Hi Ben, Please review the patch Thanks Deepak