From: "Siluvery, Arun" <arun.siluvery@linux.intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: "Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: WAs in init_clock_gating?
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 13:41:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53D0FF12.80306@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140724123319.GA4747@phenom.ffwll.local>
On 24/07/2014 13:33, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:43:11AM +0100, Siluvery, Arun wrote:
>> On 07/07/2014 22:24, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> wrote:
>>>> I don't think it's unreasonable to use a macro that checks a global
>>>> list for whether to apply a given WA. They'll be scattered all over,
>>>> but at least it'll be easy to see:
>>>> 1) whether we implement a given workaround
>>>> and
>>>> 2) which platforms & steppings it applies to based on the table.
>>>
>>> Oh, I agree it's not unreasonable. But I'm kinda begging for the
>>> simple solution since months (years?) and haven't gotten it, while
>>> still getting a steady stream of bug reports and issues. So I've
>>> readjusted my expectations ;-)
>>>
>>> If someone delivers the real deal I'll certainly won't reject it.
>>> -Daniel
>>>
>>
>> I am moving bdw workarounds from clock_gating fn to render ring init fn and
>> testing this before and after gpu reset.
>
> Testing = with an igt? Because I'll ask for this ;-)
Yes, triggering gpu reset with igt, at the moment the test fails because
of this register.
>
>> One of the workaround is to disable STC optimization, reg CACHE_MODE_1 bit6
>> set to 1. I observed that some times after boot this gets reset to 0
>> (default value) even after applying workarounds; other than workarounds no
>> one else seems to write to this function.
>> Any ideas about this behaviour?
>
> gpu init tends to do this, since clock_gating is run before that.
thanks, I will take a look.
regards
Arun
> -Daniel
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-24 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-01 16:51 WAs in init_clock_gating? Mateo Lozano, Oscar
2014-07-07 20:50 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-07 21:16 ` Jesse Barnes
2014-07-07 21:24 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-24 10:43 ` Siluvery, Arun
2014-07-24 12:33 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-24 12:41 ` Siluvery, Arun [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53D0FF12.80306@linux.intel.com \
--to=arun.siluvery@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox