From: "Sharma, Shashank" <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Kumar, Shobhit" <shobhit.kumar@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Optimize HDMI EDID reads
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 14:53:44 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53EC8020.1070707@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKMK7uH1TzO-j4hnu9=p85w+MnDkCkQubQKUwAH3_-BHCqoG6g@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Daniel,
I can do all the changes accordingly and upload a new patch.
This is what I am going to do:
1. Change the EDID caching time to a second from a minute (probably
there was a miscommunication).
2. Remove the gen_check
3. Use the connector->edid pointer to cache EDID.
I have only few problems with these two suggestions:
> Keying off the force parameter isn't actually precise enough.
It is. All the calls to HDMI detect, which come as a result of user
space interaction keep force = 1, whereas all the hot plug event callers
keep it force = 0. Please have a look:
IOCTL / Sysfs calls, calling connector->funcs->detect()
1. drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes_merge_bits => (force = 1)
2. status_show => (force = 1)
Hot plug handlers / hot plug poll
1. drm_helper_hpd_irq_event => (force = 0)
2. output_poll_execute => (force = 0)
So this should work all right.
> There's an encoder->hot_plug callback where you should invalidate the
> edid instead.
In MCG branch, we are doing this in encoder->hot_plug only. But there
the EDID stays, until there is one more next hotplug, and by that time,
the detect code uses cached EDID only.
As encoder->hot_plug function also gets called every time there is a
hot_plug, from the hotplug_work_fn, I was afraid this might cause a
race. Second, I still have to write a delayed_work wrapper, to call
encoder->hot_plug from, after the timeout.
If you feel that, its better to do it there, I can do changes accordingly.
Regards
Shashank
On 8/14/2014 1:58 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Sharma, Shashank
> <shashank.sharma@intel.com> wrote:
>> Can you please point out what is it, that's unexpected to you ?
>> I think this is what we (you & Shobhit) agreed on:
>> 1. Timeout based EDID caching
>> 2. Use of cached EDID within caching duration
>> 3. Separate path for HDMI compliance, controllable in kernel, which doesn't
>> affect current code flow.
>
> - The timeout is 1 minute instead of 1s. That breaks interactions with
> the periodical probing we do when there's a storm.
> - There's a generation check in there. This is a generic problem,
> restricting platforms only means that fewer people will be able to
> test it and find issues with broken hdmi sinks. The problem here are
> _sink_ devices, not necessarily platforms. So testing for platforms is
> bogus.
> - Keying off the force parameter isn't actually precise enough.
> There's an encoder->hot_plug callback where you should invalidate the
> edid instead.
> - Adding the edid caching to the intel_hdmi struct is the wrong place,
> we already have an edid pointer in intel_connector, which is used for
> panels. Augmenting that to allow caching with time-based invalidation
> is the right solution instead of inventing a completely new wheel.
>
> Aside: You commit message is misleading since it's actually not
> required to do a full probe cycle for the get_connector ioctl. You can
> get at the current cached mode list without any probe calls at all.
> Please have a look at SNA for how to do that. And if you have
> userspace constantly probing sysfs files and other stuff instead of
> listening to uevents then you need to fix your userspace, not cache
> the edid in the kernel for a minute.
> -Daniel
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-14 9:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-12 12:38 [PATCH 0/2] HDMI detect optimization and support for HDMI compliance shashank.sharma
2014-08-12 12:38 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Optimize HDMI EDID reads shashank.sharma
2014-08-13 12:14 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-14 6:15 ` Sharma, Shashank
2014-08-14 8:28 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-14 9:23 ` Sharma, Shashank [this message]
2014-08-14 11:57 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-18 3:00 ` Sharma, Shashank
2014-08-12 12:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Support for HDMI complaince HPD shashank.sharma
2014-08-12 12:47 ` Chris Wilson
2014-08-12 15:26 ` Sharma, Shashank
2014-08-12 15:39 ` Chris Wilson
2014-08-13 6:04 ` Sharma, Shashank
2014-08-13 6:16 ` Chris Wilson
2014-08-13 7:42 ` Sharma, Shashank
2014-08-13 12:13 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53EC8020.1070707@intel.com \
--to=shashank.sharma@intel.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=shobhit.kumar@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox