Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/bdw: Render moot context reset and switch with Execlists

["Siluvery, Arun" <arun.siluvery@linux.intel.com>]

On 26/08/2014 06:59, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 10:39:39PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 04:36:05PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 04:29:24PM +0100, Thomas Daniel wrote:
>>>> These two functions make no sense in an Logical Ring Context & Execlists
>>>> world.
>>>>
>>>> v2: We got rid of lrc_enabled and centralized everything in the sanitized
>>>> i915.enable_execlists instead.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
>>>>
>>>> v3: Rebased.  Corrected a typo in comment for i915_switch_context and
>>>> added a comment that it should not be called in execlist mode. Added
>>>> WARN_ON if i915_switch_context is called in execlist mode. Moved check
>>>> for execlist mode out of i915_switch_context and into callers. Added
>>>> comment in context_reset explaining why nothing is done in execlist
>>>> mode.
>>>
>>> No, this is not the way. The requirement is to reduce the number of
>>> special cases not increase them. These should be evaluated to be no-ops
>>> when execlists is used.
>>
>> I think it's ok-ish for now. Maybe we need to reconsider when we wire up
>> lrc reclaim - which is the real user of the switch_context in gpu_idle.
>> The problem I have though is that I can't parse the subject of the patch,
>> someone please translate that to simplified English for me. I can do the
>> replacement while applying.
>
> No, it is not. execlists is badly designed and this is a further symptom
> of that.
> -Chris
>
Thomas is not available and I am replying on his behalf.
Is the following subject is good for this patch?

"Don't execute context reset and switch when using Execlists"

regards
Arun