Re: [PATCH 0/5] A few fixes on top of the wa_regs patches

["Siluvery, Arun" <arun.siluvery@linux.intel.com>]

On 30/08/2014 16:50, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> Hi Arun,
>
> I've compiled a few patches that I think solve some small-ish issues around
> your wa_regs series. Could you please have a look at them and comment/give your
> r-b tag if you judge appropriate?
>
> On top of those patches, I'd love some comments on the issues I raised in the
> other mail and possible follow up patches to address them.
>
>    http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2014-August/051514.html

Hi Damien,

I really appreciate you taking time to not just give review comments but 
also sending patches to fix those issues.

Chris suggested a way of emitting all LRIs using a simple function and I 
really wanted to rework everything based on that suggestion.

The LRIs are now organized in an array as opposed to sending them 
individually also debugfs patch can make use of it. I have removed the 
temporary array included in driver private structure.
I think now it looks clean and we can easily add new w/a with minimal 
changes.

Since all of the patches are modified I think it is better to squash 
them with the merged ones rather than updating them with new patches so 
I have folded your patches during rework and will send them after 
testing, please review them and give your comments.

regards
Arun

>
> At some point, we'll also need a bit of coherence with what Mika has been doing:
>
>    http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2014-August/050000.html
>