From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jike Song Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] drm/i915: Clarify event_lock locking, irq&mixed context Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 18:22:48 +0800 Message-ID: <542A8478.7090909@intel.com> References: <1410785732-18553-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> <1410785732-18553-3-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> <5428FA2B.8030005@intel.com> <20140929122012.GE4109@phenom.ffwll.local> <54295484.8030604@intel.com> <20140929132712.GR4109@phenom.ffwll.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33ED36EAE4 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 03:27:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140929132712.GR4109@phenom.ffwll.local> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" To: Daniel Vetter Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On 09/29/2014 09:27 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Well, can you still please intrigue me with why you have to change our > interrupt handling from hardirq to work item? It sounds like there's some > crucial issue of the overall design hidden in there. Hi Daniel, I just sent out the patch series named "Add host i915 support for vGPU" for review :) Patch 7 of that is currently implemented as "changing our interrupt handling from hardirq to tasklet", I'd like to redesign it if we can find a better way, thanks in advance :) > > Thanks, Daniel > -- Thanks, Jike