From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Todd Previte Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915: Fix intel_dp_hot_plug() Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 17:20:39 -0700 Message-ID: <543877D7.8030006@gmail.com> References: <1412869090-48010-1-git-send-email-tprevite@gmail.com> <1412869090-48010-11-git-send-email-tprevite@gmail.com> <20141009154905.GM12897@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-pd0-f180.google.com (mail-pd0-f180.google.com [209.85.192.180]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 965B489BFE for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 17:20:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pd0-f180.google.com with SMTP id fp1so2530035pdb.11 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 17:20:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" To: Dave Airlie , Chris Wilson , "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" , Dave Airlie List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On 10/9/14 8:38 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > On 10 October 2014 01:49, Chris Wilson wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 08:38:10AM -0700, Todd Previte wrote: >>> The hot plug function for DP appears to have been broken somewhere along the way. Without >>> this function being operational, hot plug events are not correctly received for compliance >>> testing. This patch implements the necessary functionality to resolve that issue. >> Perhaps a discussion of why it was removed and how the apparent conflict >> should be resolved? >> >> In particular citing the commit that gutted the function and cc'ing the >> author (Dave Airlie) and reviwers (you) are in order. >> >> commit 0e32b39ceed665bfa4a77a4bc307b6652b991632 >> Author: Dave Airlie >> Date: Fri May 2 14:02:48 2014 +1000 >> >> drm/i915: add DP 1.2 MST support (v0.7) > I'm sure this shouldn't be needed as we get short/long hotplug DP > events in the pulse handler, > not here. > > Dave. Sounds good. Looking at the HPD pulse handler, I think I can get the necessary code in there for the non-MST case to get compliance testing working with just the pulse handler. The short pulse will catch it already, but I need to add code to the long pulse segment in order to get the correct notification there. -T